ReviewTaiwan journal of ophthalmology
Advances in refractive corneal lenticule extraction.
Review in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Correlation between effective optical zone and higher-order aberrations in keratorefractive lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- An objective assessment of vision performance at different reading distances after smooth incision lenticular keratomileusis (SILK) for myopia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Randomized controlled trial on corneal denervation, neuroinflammation and ocular surface in corneal lenticule extraction for advanced refractive correction (CLEAR) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).Eye and vision (London, England) · 2025Article
- Comparing The Existing Myopic Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction (KLEx) Platforms: A Narrative Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
- Evaluating the Impact of Angle Kappa on Effective Optical Zone in Kerato-Lenticule Extraction (KLEx) Surgery with Intraoperative Angle Kappa Adjustment.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Safety and Effectiveness of Smooth Incision Lenticular Keratomileusis (SILKClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Incisional surface quality of electron-beam irradiated cornea-extracted lenticule for stromal keratophakia: high nJ-energy vs. low nJ-energy femtosecond laser.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Ex-vivo study on the surface quality of corneal lenticule and stroma after low energy femtosecond laser lenticule extraction.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Comparison of clinical outcomes of LASIK, Trans-PRK, and SMILE for correction of myopia.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2022Article
- Analysis of the Effectiveness of SMILE, FS-LASIK, and SBK in Myopic Patients and the Impact in UCVA and Tear Film Stability.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Femtosecond-laser-assisted Small Incision Lenticule Extraction to Treat Refractive Error: A Narrative Review.Middle East African journal of ophthalmologyReview
- Femtosecond laser applications in corneal surgery.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
- Twelve-month outcomes of a new refractive lenticular extraction procedure.Journal of optometryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Refractive errors are the leading cause of reversible visual impairment worldwide. In addition to the desired spectacle independence, refractive procedures can improve quality of life, working ability, and daily working performance. Refractive corneal lenticule extraction (RCLE) is a relatively new technique, dependent only on a femtosecond laser (FS). This leads to potential benefits over laser-assisted
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.