Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34295597›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Factors and Determinants of Choosing Pathology as a Future Career: Results From a Multi-Institution Study.

Emad M Masuadi, Mohamud S Mohamud, Abdulrahman M Alhassan, Khalid G Alharbi, Ahmed S Hilabi, Faisal A Alharbi, Abdullah T Tatwani, Abdullah I Farraj, Sami Al-Nasser, Mohammed F Safi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emad M MasuadiResearch Unit/Biostatistics, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences/King Abdullah International Medical Research Centre (KAIMRC), Riyadh, SAU.
Mohamud S MohamudMedical Education, College of Medicine/King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdulrahman M AlhassanMedical Education, College of Medicine/King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU.
Khalid G AlharbiMedical Education, College of Medicine/King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU.
Ahmed S HilabiMedical Education, College of Medicine/King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU.
Faisal A AlharbiMedical Education, College of Medicine/King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdullah T TatwaniMedical Education, College of Medicine/King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdullah I FarrajPathology and Laboratory Medicine, College of Applied Medical Sciences/King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Sami Al-NasserMedical Education, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU.
Mohammed F SafiPathology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, ARE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Globally, less than 10% of graduating medical students select pathology as a future career. Many factors were reported from different settings to influence the choice of pathology. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors that determine medical students' preferences in choosing pathology as a future career. Methods This cross-sectional study surveyed students from three governmental medical schools in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A self-administered questionnaire that contained demographic questions and items that addressed perceived factors that affect the choice of pathology was distributed to medical students. Collected data were analyzed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). A chi-square test was used to determine the association between independent variables and interest in pathology. Results Out of the 400 questionnaires distributed, 338 students completed the survey with a response rate of 84.5%. Overall, surgery (24%) and internal medicine (20%) were the most favored, specialties with only 5% of the students selecting pathology as their first choice. Patient-doctor interaction (72.2%) was perceived as the most important factor in not choosing pathology as a future career. Taking an elective course, younger age groups, and year in medical school were all significantly associated (p<0.001) with an interest in pathology. Conclusion In this study, most of the students indicated surgery and internal medicine as their first specialty choices. Only 5% of the students chose pathology as their first choice. Two-thirds of medical students perceived pathologists do not interact with patients. A significant association was found between younger age groups, enrolling for a pathology course, and having an interest in pathology.

Indexed as

career choicefactorsmedical studentspathologyperception

Identifiers

PMID34295597
PMCPMC8293683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.