Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34295596›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Current Trends of Carcinoma: Experience of a Tertiary Care Cancer Center in North India.

Manjit K Rana, Tushar S Barwal, Uttam Sharma, Richika Bansal, Karuna Singh, Amrit Pal S Rana, Aklank Jain, Utkarshni Khera

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Circulating long non-coding RNANon-coding RNA research · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Manjit K RanaPathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, IND.
Tushar S BarwalResearch, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, IND.
Uttam SharmaResearch, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, IND.
Richika BansalPathology, Advanced Cancer Institute, Baba Farid University of Health Sciences, Bathinda, IND.
Karuna SinghRadiation Oncology, Advanced Cancer Institute, Baba Farid University of Health Sciences, Bathinda, IND.
Amrit Pal S RanaSurgery, Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, Baba Farid University of Health Sciences, Faridkot, IND.
Aklank JainBiochemistry, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, IND.
Utkarshni KheraPathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, IND.
Central University of Punjab · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INBaba Farid University of Health Sciences · INCancer Institute (WIA) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Cancer incidence across the geographical area is mercurial and factors like dietary habits, environment, social structure, genetics govern relative incidence. Malwa region of Punjab is one such geographical area of India speculated to have a higher incidence of cancer. The current analysis was done to assess the occurrence of cancer in the region and to analyze the trends and types of carcinoma with age, gender, site, and histopathological type, and to compare with the trends mentioned in the literature. Methods A retrospective analysis was done to collect and collate 2088 cancer patients' pathological records for three years at a tertiary treatment center. The collated data was digitized and used to create tables and histograms. Result Of the 2088 cancer cases, the leading cancer site was breast (24.7%) in females, followed by cancer of female genetic tract (18.9%), whereas in males, the most common site involved was head and neck (17.5%) followed by esophagus (10.3%). The leading cancer type for males was squamous cell carcinoma and for females was infiltrating ductal cell carcinoma. Breast carcinoma was most commonly seen cancer (40.5%) followed by female genital tract carcinoma and esophageal carcinoma in female patients. Whereas in males, head and neck carcinoma was most commonly identified (37.5%) followed by the gastrointestinal tract and esophageal carcinoma. This higher incidence may be attributed to better medical facilities, cancer awareness, and novel government schemes. Conclusion Based on our comprehensive analysis, we conclude that there was a change in trends of all types of carcinomas in males and females except breast carcinoma, which was seen as the most common carcinoma in female patients. Our findings suggest and support the strong implementation of cancer awareness programs and epidemiological studies to know the changing trends of risk factors in the region.

Indexed as

carcinomaesophagushead and neck tumorshistopathological profileincidence

Identifiers

PMID34295596
PMCPMC8293302
OpenAlexW3173793524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.