Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34295589›Full record

ReviewCureus2021

A Rapid Review of Burns First Aid Guidelines: Is There Consistency Across International Guidelines?

Michael McLure, Finlay Macneil, Fiona M Wood, Leila Cuttle, Kathryn Eastwood, Janet Bray, Lincoln M Tracy

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Characteristics of paediatric burn injuries seen in the tertiary emergency centre, South Africa.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael McLureDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, AUS.
Finlay MacneilDepartment of Urology, Gosford District Hospital and Gosford Private Hospital, Gosford, AUS.
Fiona M WoodState Adult Burn Unit, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, AUS.
Leila CuttleSchool of Biomedical Science, Queensland University of Technology, South Brisbane, AUS.
Kathryn EastwoodDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, AUS.
Janet BrayDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, AUS.
Lincoln M TracyDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, AUS.
Fiona Stanley Hospital · AUCurtin University · AUGosford Hospital · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a rapid review of current international and Australian/New Zealand guidelines on first aid for burns to identify any critical variation and any recent major changes in the literature that would warrant a significant change to current recommendations. A search was conducted to identify Australian/New Zealand and international first aid guidelines for burn care using guideline databases, and we compared key recommendations from each guideline relating to burns first aid. A literature search of relevant databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO international register of systematic reviews, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases) was conducted to identify existing and in-progress research published on the topic of first aid for burn injuries. Seven guidelines were identified from the Australia/New Zealand region, and 11 international guidelines were identified from the United States of America and Europe. All Australian and New Zealand guidelines recommended a cooling duration of 20 minutes and made some mention of when to refer a burn for medical evaluation, while international guidelines saw cooling duration variation, a number of guidelines failed to mention referral criteria. The review of published systematic reviews and clinical trials revealed a lack of new evidence in the last six years. Our rapid review identified key variation between first aid guidelines for burns that would benefit from the development of an international consensus on management. We identified no new significant evidence that would alter guideline recommendations and did not identify any upcoming reviews or clinical trials on this subject.

Indexed as

burn first aidburns and scaldsguidelineinternational guidelinesrapid review

Identifiers

PMID34295589
PMCPMC8291991
OpenAlexW3173298061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.