Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34295554›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2021

Digestive tract reconstruction of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a comparison of the intracorporeal overlap, intracorporeal hand-sewn anastomosis, and extracorporeal anastomosis.

Zeshen Wang, Xirui Liu, Qingqing Cheng, Yuzhe Wei, Zhenglong Li, Guanyu Zhu, Yanfeng Li, Kuan Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zeshen WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Xirui LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Qingqing ChengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Yuzhe WeiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Zhenglong LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Guanyu ZhuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Yanfeng LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Kuan WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Harbin Medical University · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe application of esophagojejunostomy has certain difficulties in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG). This is due to the higher requirement for surgical techniques and the lack of any unified standards. This study aim to explore the practicability and safety of intracorporeal overlap and intracorporeal hand-sewn anastomosis compared with extracorporeal anastomosis.

methodsThe clinical pathological data of 56 patients who underwent TLTG from March 2016 to December 2020 in the Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to the method of anastomosis, the patients were divided into the overlap (n=36) and the hand-sewn anastomosis (n=20). Patients who receive laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG; n=74) formed the control group. The basic clinical data, and intraoperative and postoperative results of the patients were assessed.

resultsCompared with the control group, the overlap anastomosis and hand-sewn anastomosis groups showed no significant differences in clinicopathological data and short-term postoperative recovery. There were no significant differences between the overlap and the control group in operation time nor anastomosis time. However, the anastomosis time of the hand-sewn anastomosis group was significantly prolonged compared to the control group (53.20±14.14

conclusionsThe overlap anastomosis and hand-sewn anastomosis are practical and safe. Furthermore, the overlap anastomosis may be more suitable for patients with lower cardia and fundic lesions. The hand-sewn method has a wider range of indications pending advanced surgical skills, and is an effective supplementary technique for instrument anastomosis.

Indexed as

circular staplerGastric cancerhand-sewnlinear stapleroverlaptotally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG)

Identifiers

PMID34295554
PMCPMC8261309
OpenAlexW3167942376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.