Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34295521›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2021

Having a stake in the future and perceived population density influence intergenerational cooperation.

Chia-Chen Chang, Nadiah P Kristensen, Thi Phuong Le Nghiem, Claudia L Y Tan, L Roman Carrasco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chia-Chen ChangDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-9853-8949
Nadiah P KristensenDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore.
Thi Phuong Le NghiemDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore.
Claudia L Y TanDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore.
L Roman CarrascoDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2894-1473

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intergenerational common-pool resource games represent a new experimental paradigm in which the current generation's decision to cooperate or defect influences future generations who cannot reciprocate, providing key insights for sustainability science. We combine experimental and theoretical approaches to assess the roles of having a stake in the future (50% chance to pass the resource on to themselves in the next generation) and reminders of the presence of others (exposure to people-chatting sounds) on intergenerational cooperation. We find that, as expected, having a stake in the future increases cooperation with future generations, except when participants are also exposed to people-chatting sounds. We hypothesize that this interaction effect occurs because people-chatting sounds trigger a perception of large group size, which reduces the chance of individuals and their descendants benefiting from the pool in the future, thus reducing cooperation. Our results highlight the context-dependent effect of having a future stake on intergenerational cooperation for resource sustainability, and suggest an area of future work for environmental messaging.

Indexed as

common-pool resource gameintergenerational cooperationsocial dilemmasustainability

Identifiers

PMID34295521
PMCPMC8278064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.