Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34295471›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational immunology2021

Systematic evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 antigens enables a highly specific and sensitive multiplex serological COVID-19 assay.

Sophia Hober, Cecilia Hellström, Jennie Olofsson, Eni Andersson, Sofia Bergström, August Jernbom Falk, Shaghayegh Bayati, Sara Mravinacova, Ronald Sjöberg, Jamil Yousef and 40 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Distinct roles of vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralizing antibodies and T cells in protection and disease.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Advances and Utility of the Human Plasma Proteome.Journal of proteome research · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

50 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Sophia HoberDivision of Protein Technology Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0605-8417
Cecilia HellströmDivision of Affinity Proteomics Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology SciLifeLab Stockholm Sweden.
Jennie OlofssonDivision of Affinity Proteomics Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology SciLifeLab Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8593-9089
Eni AnderssonDivision of Affinity Proteomics Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology SciLifeLab Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5115-0637
Sofia BergströmDivision of Affinity Proteomics Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology SciLifeLab Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2910-4754
August Jernbom FalkDivision of Affinity Proteomics Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology SciLifeLab Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7773-1851
Shaghayegh BayatiDivision of Affinity Proteomics Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology SciLifeLab Stockholm Sweden.
Sara MravinacovaDivision of Affinity Proteomics Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology SciLifeLab Stockholm Sweden.
Ronald SjöbergDivision of Affinity Proteomics Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology SciLifeLab Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1363-5796
Jamil YousefDivision of Affinity Proteomics Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology SciLifeLab Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5915-1258
Lovisa SkoglundDivision of Affinity Proteomics Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology SciLifeLab Stockholm Sweden.
Sara KanjeDivision of Protein Technology Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Sweden.
Anna BerlingDivision of Protein Technology Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Sweden.
Anne-Sophie SvenssonDivision of Protein Technology Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Sweden.
Gabriella JensenDivision of Protein Technology Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Sweden.
Henric EnstedtDivision of Protein Technology Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Sweden.
Delaram AfshariDivision of Protein Technology Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Sweden.
Lan Lan XuDivision of Protein Technology Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Sweden.
Martin ZwahlenDivision of Systems Biology Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology SciLifeLab Stockholm Sweden.
Kalle von FeilitzenDivision of Systems Biology Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology SciLifeLab Stockholm Sweden.
Leo HankeDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.
Ben MurrellDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.
Gerald McInerneyDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.
Gunilla B Karlsson HedestamDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.
Christofer LendelDivision of Applied Physical Chemistry Department of Chemistry KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Sweden.
Robert G RothDiscovery Biology, Discovery Sciences AstraZeneca Gothenburg Sweden.
Ingmar SkoogCentre for Ageing and Health University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
Elisabet SvenungssonDivision of Rheumatology Department of Medicine Solna Karolinska Institutet Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden.
Tomas OlssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience Center for Molecular Medicine Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.
Anna Fogdell-HahnDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience Center for Molecular Medicine Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.
Ylva LindrothDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Medical Microbiology Lund University Skåne Laboratory Medicine Lund Sweden.
Maria LundgrenDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Office of Medical Services Region Skåne Lund Sweden.
Kimia T MalekiCenter för Infectious Medicine Department of Medicine Huddinge Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.
Nina LagerqvistDepartment of Microbiology Public Health Agency of Sweden Solna Sweden.
Jonas KlingströmCenter för Infectious Medicine Department of Medicine Huddinge Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9076-1441
Rui Da Silva RodriguesDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden.
Sandra MuschiolDepartment of Clinical Microbiology Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden.
Gordana BogdanovicDepartment of Clinical Microbiology Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden.
Laila Sara Arroyo MührDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.
Carina EklundKarolinska University Laboratory Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden.
Camilla LaghedenKarolinska University Laboratory Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden.
Joakim DillnerKarolinska University Laboratory Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden.
Åsa SivertssonDivision of Protein Technology Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Sweden.
Sebastian HavervallDivision of Internal Medicine Department of Clinical Sciences Karolinska Institutet Danderyd Hospital Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1671-8183
Charlotte ThålinDivision of Internal Medicine Department of Clinical Sciences Karolinska Institutet Danderyd Hospital Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1345-6491
Hanna TegelDivision of Protein Technology Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7067-9173
Elisa PinDivision of Affinity Proteomics Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology SciLifeLab Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2158-2674
Anna MånbergDivision of Affinity Proteomics Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology SciLifeLab Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0056-1313
My HedhammarDivision of Protein Technology Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0140-419X
Peter NilssonDivision of Affinity Proteomics Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology SciLifeLab Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4657-8532
Science for Life Laboratory · SEKTH Royal Institute of Technology · SEKarolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEPublic Health Agency of Sweden · SEAstraZeneca (Sweden) · SELund University · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe COVID-19 pandemic poses an immense need for accurate, sensitive and high-throughput clinical tests, and serological assays are needed for both overarching epidemiological studies and evaluating vaccines. Here, we present the development and validation of a high-throughput multiplex bead-based serological assay.

methodsMore than 100 representations of SARS-CoV-2 proteins were included for initial evaluation, including antigens produced in bacterial and mammalian hosts as well as synthetic peptides. The five best-performing antigens, three representing the spike glycoprotein and two representing the nucleocapsid protein, were further evaluated for detection of IgG antibodies in samples from 331 COVID-19 patients and convalescents, and in 2090 negative controls sampled before 2020.

resultsThree antigens were finally selected, represented by a soluble trimeric form and the S1-domain of the spike glycoprotein as well as by the C-terminal domain of the nucleocapsid. The sensitivity for these three antigens individually was found to be 99.7%, 99.1% and 99.7%, and the specificity was found to be 98.1%, 98.7% and 95.7%. The best assay performance was although achieved when utilising two antigens in combination, enabling a sensitivity of up to 99.7% combined with a specificity of 100%. Requiring any two of the three antigens resulted in a sensitivity of 99.7% and a specificity of 99.4%.

conclusionThese observations demonstrate that a serological test based on a combination of several SARS-CoV-2 antigens enables a highly specific and sensitive multiplex serological COVID-19 assay.

Indexed as

COVID‐19IgGmultiplexSARS‐CoV‐2serological assay

Identifiers

PMID34295471
PMCPMC8288725
OpenAlexW3183731603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.