Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34295465›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2021

Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device (IUD): A case report.

Hicham Benaguida, Hamza Kiram, Ely Cheikh Telmoudi, Btissam Ouafidi, Mustapha Benhessou, Mohamed Ennachit, Mohamed Elkarroumi

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Intractable diarrhea caused by a rare rectal foreign body.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Migrated intrauterine device: Case series report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hicham BenaguidaResident Doctor in Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Univesity Hospital Center Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, 20100, Morocco.
Hamza KiramResident Doctor in Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Univesity Hospital Center Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, 20100, Morocco.
Ely Cheikh TelmoudiResident Doctor in Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Univesity Hospital Center Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, 20100, Morocco.
Btissam OuafidiResident Doctor in Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Univesity Hospital Center Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, 20100, Morocco.
Mustapha BenhessouProfessor in Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Univesity Hospital Center Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, 20100, Morocco.
Mohamed EnnachitProfessor in Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Univesity Hospital Center Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, 20100, Morocco.
Mohamed ElkarroumiHead of Service in Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Univesity Hospital Center Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, 20100, Morocco.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ibn Rochd · MA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe IUD is one of the most widely used reversible, long-term contraceptive methods in the world. About 80% of IUDs are found in the peritoneal cavity after uterine perforation. CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old female patient presented with chronic pelvic pain with minimal metrorrhagia for 8 months on IUD. On examination, there was no IUD thread. Pelvic ultrasound showed a hypoechoic, heterogeneous, poorly limited formation measuring 3 × 2.68 cm. Abdominal-pelvic CT scan showed hyperdense supravesical material surrounded by a hypo-dense, well-limited collection measuring 26 × 25 mm. Laparoscopy showed an anterior peritoneal collection above the bladder containing the IUD, a uterus, adnexa, and a bladder without abnormality. The IUD was removed after incision of the collection and aspiration of the pus. DISCUSSION: The IUD is one of the most widely used long-term reversible contraceptive methods in the world. But like any foreign body, it can present complications, notably migration after uterine perforation, which remains rare, and even rarer peritoneal localization. The clinical diagnosis is not always obvious, and additional examinations are necessary to locate the device, including endovaginal ultrasound, a CT scan or magnetic resonance imaging.WHO recommends surgical removal of the migrated IUD by minimally invasive methods, including hysteroscopy, cystoscopy, colonoscopy, or laparoscopy, depending on the location of the IUD.

conclusionIUDs are effective contraceptive measures, and the majority of patients with uterine perforation by IUD migration are asymptomatic. Diagnosis is based on a thorough gynecologic analysis and appropriate radiologic imaging.

Indexed as

IntraperitonealIntrauterine deviceLaparoscopyMigration

Identifiers

PMID34295465
PMCPMC8281585
OpenAlexW3180804537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.