Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34295421›Full record

ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2021

Minimal clinically important difference in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Mohleen Kang, Lucian Marts, Jordan A Kempker, Srihari Veeraraghavan

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohleen KangDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0471-2884
Lucian MartsDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jordan A KempkerDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6830-5201
Srihari VeeraraghavanDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Emory University · US

Funding

The Emory Training Program in Lung HealthT32HL116271 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, LOU ANN S, GUIDOT, DAVID MARSHALL · 2013 to 2022
$4.2M
A Geographic Approach to Determining the Preventable Causes of US Sepsis MortalityK08HS025240 · AHRQ · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI KEMPKER, JORDAN ANTHONY · 2018 to 2020
$451k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS025240NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL116271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive fibrosing lung disease with an estimated median survival of 2-5 years and a significant impact on quality of life (QoL). Current approved medications, pirfenidone and nintedanib, have shown a reduction in annual decline of forced vital capacity but no impact on QoL. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is a threshold value for a change in a parameter that is considered meaningful by the patient rather than solely relying on statistically significant change in the parameter. This review provides a brief overview of the MCID methodology along with detailed discussion of reported MCID values for commonly used physiological measures and patient-reported outcome measures in IPF. While there is no gold standard methodology for determining MCID, there are certain limitations in the MCID literature in IPF, mainly the choice of death, hospitalisation and pulmonary function tests as sole anchors, and pervasive use of distribution-based methods which do not take into account the patient's input. There is a critical need to identify accurate thresholds of outcome measures that reflect patient's QoL over time in order to more precisely design and evaluate future clinical trials and to develop algorithms for patient-oriented management of IPF in outpatient clinics. EDUCATIONAL

aimsTo understand the concept of MCID and the methods used to determine these values.To understand the indications and limitations of MCID values in IPF.

Identifiers

PMID34295421
PMCPMC8291912
OpenAlexW3185051730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.