Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34295375›Full record

ArticleJournal of infection prevention2021

UK Vessel Health and Preservation (VHP) Framework: a commentary on the updated VHP 2020.

Carole Hallam, Andrea Denton, Valya Weston, Helen Dunn, Tim Jackson, Susan Keeling, Steve Hill

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of infection prevention, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Carole HallamAC Independent Nursing Consultants, Huddersfield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3333-3250
Andrea DentonAC Independent Nursing Consultants, Huddersfield, UK.
Valya WestonAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK.
Helen DunnGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Tim JacksonCalderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, Huddersfield, UK.
Susan KeelingCharing Cross Hospital, London, UK.
Steve HillThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust · GBCalderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust · GBCharing Cross Hospital · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2016, a UK vessel health and preservation (VHP) framework was developed to support healthcare staff to select the most appropriate vascular access device for patients requiring intravenous therapy. The VHP framework was based on available evidence and expert consensus. The VHP was based on available evidence and expert consensus. DEVELOPMENT OF THE VHP 2020 FRAMEWORK: A multidisciplinary team reviewed the original UK VHP framework and considered new published evidence, national and international guidelines and expert opinion. A literature search was performed using Cinahl and Medline, incorporating a variety of terms linked to vascular access devices, assessment and selection. Articles published in and after 2014 in English were included. Twelve articles were found to be relevant including three evidence-based guidelines, two randomised control trials and one systematic review.

findingsThree main studies provided the evidence for the update: the MAGIC study that assessed the appropriateness of peripherally inserted central catheters in patients; a study that utilised the 'A-DIVA scale' to predict the likelihood of difficult venous access; and a study that incorporated an 'I-DECIDED tool' for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and decision-making for device removal. In addition, published guidelines provided evidence that the original advice on appropriate osmolarity of medicines for peripheral administration needed updating.

conclusionThe 2020 UK VHP framework reflects latest evidence-based research and guidelines, providing healthcare staff updated guidance to assist in maintaining good practice in vascular access assessment and device selection and patient safety.

Indexed as

peripheral vein assessmentvascular access device assessmentvascular access device selectionVessel healthvessel health and preservation

Identifiers

PMID34295375
PMCPMC8274140
OpenAlexW3112591034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.