Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34295361›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2021

Invasion and rapid adaptation of guppies (

William C Rosenthal, Peter B McIntyre, Peter J Lisi, Robert B Prather, Kristine N Moody, Michael J Blum, James Derek Hogan, Sean D Schoville

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genomic investigations of successful invasions: the picture emerging from recent studies.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Invasion and rapid adaptation of guppies (Evolutionary applications · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

William C RosenthalCenter for Limnology University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison WI USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2240-3970
Peter B McIntyreCenter for Limnology University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison WI USA.
Peter J LisiCenter for Limnology University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison WI USA.
Robert B PratherDepartment of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology University of California Riverside Riverside CA USA.
Kristine N MoodyDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee Knoxville Knoxville TN USA.
Michael J BlumDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee Knoxville Knoxville TN USA.
James Derek HoganDepartment of Life Sciences Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Corpus Christi TX USA.
Sean D SchovilleDepartment of Entomology University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison WI USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7364-434X
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USTulane University · USTexas A&M University – Corpus Christi · USUniversity of California, Riverside · USUniversity of Wyoming · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How much does natural selection, as opposed to genetic drift, admixture, and gene flow, contribute to the evolution of invasive species following introduction to a new environment? Here we assess how evolution can shape biological invasions by examining population genomic variation in non-native guppies (

Indexed as

biological adaptationHawai‘iintroduced speciesmolecular evolutionpopulation genomics

Identifiers

PMID34295361
PMCPMC8288002
OpenAlexW3146910468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.