ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2021
Comparison of Visual Transient Elastography and Shear Wave Elastography in Evaluating Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modern ultrasound techniques for diagnosing liver steatosis and fibrosis: A systematic review with a focus on biopsy comparison.World journal of hepatology · 2025Article
- Liver fibrosis stage classification in stacked microvascular images based on deep learning.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study investigated the effectiveness and feasibility of shear wave elastography ((sound touch elastography) STE and (shear wave elastography) SWE) and visual transient elastography (ViTE) in the noninvasive quantitative diagnosis of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease (CLD). PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 106 patients with CLD underwent STE, SWE and ViTE elastography evaluation. The Young's modulus of the three elastography was valuated and the diagnostic performances of the three techniques for liver fibrosis staging were compared. The area under the receiver operating curve (ROC) for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis was compared. The final diagnosis was based on the histological findings on the liver biopsy.
results1) The correlation between ViTE and SWE, ViTE and STE, SWE and STE stiffness values were 0.72, 0.75, 0.75 (P<0.001). 2) The relationship between the results of each elastography technique and the stage of pathological liver fibrosis showed that the more severe the liver fibrosis was, the higher the stiffness value was (all P <0.001). 3) When the three elastography techniques were used to detect the degree of liver fibrosis in different pathological stages, there was no statistical difference in the stabilities of the boxplots. 4) The ROCs of the three elastography techniques (ViTE, SWE and STE) were 0.88, 0.91, 0.92, F0 vs F1-3; 0.84, 0.84, 0.84, F0-1 vs F2-4; 0.80, 0.79, 0.77, F0-2 vs F3-4; 0.80, 0.76, 0.71, F0-3 vs 4; the AUC of ViTE was higher than the AUC of STE in the identification of F4, but there were no statistical differences in the AUCs of other groups.
conclusionViTE has good stability for the liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and a high consistency with shear-wave elastography (SWE and STE). It is an effective tool for evaluating CLD, and its performance is comparable to SWE and STE. The combination of ViTE and STE can improve the specificity of disease diagnosis and do not add extra cost and may improve cost performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.