Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34295088›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2021

5-ALA-Induced Fluorescent Cytology in the Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer-a Preliminary Report.

Rangrez Shadab, Rajendra B Nerli, Bidi R Saziya, S C Ghagane, Chandra Shreya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Applications of Photodynamic Therapy in Endometrial Diseases.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Detection of bladder cancer using voided urine sample and by targeting genomic VPAC receptors.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rangrez ShadabDepartment of Urology, JN Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education & Research (Deemed-to-be-University), JNMC Campus, Belagavi, Karnataka 590010 India.
Rajendra B NerliDepartment of Urology, JN Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education & Research (Deemed-to-be-University), JNMC Campus, Belagavi, Karnataka 590010 India.
Bidi R SaziyaUrinary Biomarkers Research Centre, Division of Urologic-Oncology, KLES Dr. Prabhakar Kore Hospital & Medical Research Centre, Belagavi, Karnataka 590010 India.
S C GhaganeUrinary Biomarkers Research Centre, Division of Urologic-Oncology, KLES Dr. Prabhakar Kore Hospital & Medical Research Centre, Belagavi, Karnataka 590010 India.
Chandra ShreyaUrinary Biomarkers Research Centre, Division of Urologic-Oncology, KLES Dr. Prabhakar Kore Hospital & Medical Research Centre, Belagavi, Karnataka 590010 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

5-Aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-induced fluorescence cystoscopy has established itself in the detection of flat and/or small lesions. This is explained by the simple fact that there is increased uptake of ALA, altered activity of certain enzymes, and altered intracellular redistribution and storage of protoporphyrin IX (PPIX) in the malignant cells. Intracellular PPIX allows red fluorescence detection. In this preliminary study, the efficacy of 5-ALA-induced fluorescent urine cytology was compared with conventional cytology in the diagnosis of bladder tumours. In this prospective study, patients ≥18 years of age admitted to the department of urology with non-malignant conditions formed the controls and patients ≥18 years of age with imaging confirmed bladder tumours formed the study group. Freshly voided urine sample was collected from these patients and divided into two samples of 50 cc each. One of these samples was sent in for conventional cytology examination, whereas the other sample was sent in for 5-ALA fluorescent photo dynamic diagnosis. Conventional cytology and 5-ALA-induced fluorescent cytology were evaluated by the same pathologist. A total of 100 patients were included in the study of which 75 patients were controls and the remaining 25 were patients with bladder tumours. The sensitivity of conventional cytology and 5-ALA-induced fluorescent cytology was 64% and 100% respectively, whereas the specificity was 96% and 98.67% respectively. The sensitivity of conventional cytology was 61.19% in low-grade cancers as compared to 75% in high-grade cancers, whereas the sensitivity was 100% with 5-ALA-induced fluorescent cytology both in low- as well as high-grade cancers. Our study shows that 5-ALA-induced fluorescent cytology is highly sensitive test to diagnose bladder cancer and shows a significant difference especially in low-grade bladder cancer when compared to conventional cytology.

Indexed as

5-Aminolevulinic acidCytologySensitivitySpecificityUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID34295088
PMCPMC8272758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.