ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2021
A Prospective Study Comparing the Role of 18 FDG PET-CT with Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography and Tc99m Bone Scan for Staging Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.
Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exceptional Locoregional Pathological Response in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treated With Palliative Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Stage-dependent performance and molecular subtype-specific relapse patterns on same-session [18F]FDG PET/contrast-enhanced CT in breast cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in the localization of the lesions in the osteogenic region of breast cancer bone metastases after therapy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients require an accurate staging of the disease to rule out distant metastases. Various imaging investigations are used to stage LABC patients. The present study is a prospective comparison of conventional imaging (CI) with fusion positron-emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) scans in the staging of LABC patients. Seventy-three consecutive LABC patients presenting to the breast cancer clinic of the tertiary care cancer institute were included in the study. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography, Tv99m bone scintigraphy, and fusion PET-CT. Histology of the metastatic site was confirmed wherever possible. The disparity between the two imaging findings was compared. Doubtful lesions were observed clinically for at least 2 years to confirm their nature. PET-CT detected a higher number of lymph nodes in the axilla, internal mammary, and supraclavicular region as compared to CI. PET-CT upstaged 36.98% and downstaged 5.4% of the patients respectively leading to a change in the management in 30.13% of the patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CI and PET-CT were 71.87%, 87.80%, 82.14%, and 80%, and 90.90%, 90%, 88.23%, and 92.30% respectively. PET-CT was more accurate in staging the LABC patients as compared to CI. PET-CT is more accurate then contrast-enhanced CT and bone scintigraphy for staging locally advanced breast carcinoma patients. It can replace multiple organ-directed imaging in staging breast cancer. It can provide accurate staging of the disease so that patients can be prognosticated and can be directed to the most appropriate treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.