ReviewJournal of food science and technology2021
Effect of pulsed light treatment on enzymes and protein allergens associated with their structural changes: a review.
Review in Journal of food science and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of Non-Thermal Processing Technologies in Modulating Protein Allergenicity in Legumes.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
- Chemical Food Safety of Edible Insects in the European Union: Current Evidence and Regulatory Blind Spots.Toxics · 2026Review
- Advances in Food Processing Techniques for Allergenicity Reduction and Allergen Identification.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Traditional and Emerging Physical Processing Technologies: Applications and Challenges in Allergen Control of Animal and Plant Proteins.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025Review
- The influence of processing technologies on the biological activity of carbohydrates in food.Food chemistry: X · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pulsed light (PL) technique is used for food and surface decontamination widely. The sterilization effect of PL is well known and identified as the photo-chemical effect. Besides, PL is used to inactivate enzymes, reduce the immunoreactivity of proteins, and change protein function properties at a laboratory level. The current study aims to review the effect of PL on proteins by highlighting the differences between proteins in buffer solutions or food systems. Although PL is known as a non-thermal technique, most studies done on food systems, food temperature raised considerably. Therefore, PL inactivated many enzymes in buffer solution non-thermally, while mostly with a high increase in temperature of a food system. PL reduced food allergens several folds in some foods. However, immunoreactivity responses of some protein were increased after PL treatment. Also, the current study covers the conformational changes of proteins that occur because of PL treatment. Therefore, some techniques used to follow proteins structural changes such as polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), etc. were defined. Studies reported that PL altered proteins structure differently. For example, some studies reported that PL degraded some proteins, while other studies suggested that PL aggregated proteins. Also, there were contrary results regarding α-helix and ß-sheet concentration for the treated proteins. In conclusion, some techniques, such as amino acid sequencing, specially when some small new fragments proteins appeared on SDS-PAGE, should be used to detect the effect of PL on proteins precisely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.