ReviewPathologica2021
Benign biliary neoplasms and biliary tumor precursors.
Review in Pathologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Biliary Adenofibroma and the Threat of Malignant Transformation.International journal of surgical pathology · 2025Review
- Magnetic resonance imaging features of intrahepatic bile duct adenoma: a 10-year retrospective study.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Multiple bile duct adenomas mimicking hepatic metastases during laparoscopic cholecystectomy - A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- Pathologic results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy specimens with 8148 patients in a single center.Turkish journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical and Imaging Features of a Focal Intrahepatic Biliary Stricture Visualized Only as Duct Dilatation.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2024Article
- Spatial transcriptomics profiling of gallbladder adenocarcinoma: a detailed two-case study of progression from precursor lesions to cancer.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Clinical implications of pediatric biliary intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosed from a choledochal cyst specimen.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- Pathological, molecular, and clinical characteristics of cholangiocarcinoma: A comprehensive review.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022Review
- Intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile ducts-what can be seen with ultrasound?Endoscopic ultrasoundReview
- Hepatic Biliary Adenofibroma: Histological Characteristics, Diagnostic Challenges, and Its Role as a Precursor to Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of clinical and translational pathologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Benign biliary tumor are common lesions that are often an incidental finding in subjects who undergo medical imaging tests for other conditions. Most are true neoplasms while few result from reactive or malformative proliferation. Benign tumors have no clinical consequences, although the premalignant nature or potential for malignant transformation is of concern in some cases. The main practical problem for pathologists is the need to differentiate them from malignant biliary tumours, which is not always straightforward. Premalignant lesions of the bile duct have been described, although their incidence has been poorly characterized. These lesions include biliary mucinous cystic neoplasms, intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct, and biliary intraepithelial neoplasia. In this article, histopathology of benign biliary tumors and biliary tumor precursors is discussed, with a focus on the main diagnostic criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.