Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34294824›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Data-driven modelling approach to circadian temperature rhythm profiles in free-living conditions.

Jari Lipsanen, Liisa Kuula, Marko Elovainio, Timo Partonen, Anu-Katriina Pesonen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jari LipsanenSleepwell Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Liisa KuulaSleepwell Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Marko ElovainioSleepwell Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Timo PartonenDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Anu-Katriina PesonenSleepwell Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. anukatriina.pesonen@helsinki.fi.
University of Helsinki · FIFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The individual variation in the circadian rhythms at the physiological level is not well understood. Albeit self-reported circadian preference profiles have been consolidated, their premises are grounded on human experience, not on physiology. We used data-driven, unsupervised time series modelling to characterize distinct profiles of the circadian rhythm measured from skin surface temperature in free-living conditions. We demonstrate the existence of three distinct clusters of individuals which differed in their circadian temperature profiles. The cluster with the highest temperature amplitude and the lowest midline estimating statistic of rhythm, or rhythm-adjusted mean, had the most regular and early-timed sleep-wake rhythm, and was the least probable for those with a concurrent delayed sleep phase, or eveningness chronotype. While the clusters associated with the observed sleep and circadian preference patterns, the entirely unsupervised modelling of physiological data provides a novel basis for modelling and understanding the human circadian functions in free-living conditions.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmModels, TheoreticalTemperatureAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleSelf ReportSleepSleep Disorders, Circadian RhythmSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34294824
PMCPMC8298484
OpenAlexW3185874407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.