Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34294736›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Nutrient provision capacity of alternative livestock farming systems per area of arable farmland required.

M R F Lee, J P Domingues, G A McAuliffe, M Tichit, F Accatino, T Takahashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Role of livestock in circular bioeconomy systems.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Protein quality as a complementary functional unit in life cycle assessment (LCA).The international journal of life cycle assessment · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M R F LeeHarper Adams University, Newport, Shropshire, TF10 8NB, UK.
J P DominguesINRAE/AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 75005, Paris, France.
G A McAuliffeRothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon, EX20 2SB, UK.
M TichitINRAE/AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 75005, Paris, France.
F AccatinoINRAE/AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 75005, Paris, France.
T TakahashiRothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon, EX20 2SB, UK. taro.takahashi@rothamsted.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/C/000I0320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although climate impacts of ruminant agriculture are a major concern worldwide, using policy instruments to force grazing farms out of the livestock industry may diminish opportunities to produce nutritious food without exacerbating the food-feed competition for fertile and accessible land resources. Here, we present a new set of quantitative evidence to demonstrate that, per unit of overall nutrient value supplied by a given commodity, the demand for land suitable for human-edible crop production is considerably smaller under ruminant systems than monogastric systems, and consistently so at both farm and regional scales. We also demonstrate that imposition of a naïvely designed "red meat tax" has the potential to invite socioeconomic losses far greater than its environmental benefits, due largely to the induced misallocation of resources at the national scale. Our results reiterate the risk inherent in an excessively climate-focused debate on the role of livestock in human society and call for more multidimensional approaches of sustainability assessment to draw better-balanced policy packages.

Identifiers

PMID34294736
PMCPMC8298395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.