Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34294731›Full record

ArticleScientific data2021

resistancebank.org, an open-access repository for surveys of antimicrobial resistance in animals.

Nicola G Criscuolo, João Pires, Cheng Zhao, Thomas P Van Boeckel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evidence for antimicrobial stewardship and reduced antimicrobial resistance in the Mid-West of Ireland, 2012 to 2023: findings from a One Health study.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Antimicrobial Resistance in CommensalAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicola G CriscuoloInstitute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland. nicola.criscuolo@usys.ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-0888
João PiresInstitute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9738-4423
Cheng ZhaoInstitute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3176-0593
Thomas P Van BoeckelInstitute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6556-0952

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing threat to the health of humans and animals that requires global actions. In high-income countries, surveillance systems helped inform policies to curb AMR in animals. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), demand for meat is rising, and developing policies against AMR is urgent. However, surveillance of AMR is at best nascent, and the current evidence base to inform policymakers is geographically heterogeneous. We present resistancebank.org, an online platform that centralizes information on AMR in animals from 1,285 surveys from LMICs. Surveys were conducted between 2000 and 2019 and include 22,403 resistance rates for pathogens isolated from chickens, cattle, sheep, and pigs. The platform is built as a shiny application that provides access to individual surveys, country-level reports, and maps of AMR at 10 × 10 kilometers resolution. The platform is accessed via any internet browser and enables users to upload surveys to strengthen a global database. resistancebank.org aims to be a focal point for sharing AMR data in LMICs and to help international funders prioritize their actions.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleChickensDatasets as TopicSheepSoftwareSwineUser-Computer InterfaceAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID34294731
PMCPMC8298417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.