Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34294256›Full record

ArticleCurrents in pharmacy teaching & learning2021

Pharmacy student stress with transition to online education during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Omar F Attarabeen, Chelsea Gresham-Dolby, Kimberly Broedel-Zaugg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Omar F AttarabeenDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Administration, & Research, School of Pharmacy, Marshall University, One John Marshall Dr., Huntington, WV 25755, United States. Electronic address: attarabeen@marshall.com.
Chelsea Gresham-DolbyDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Administration, & Research, School of Pharmacy, Marshall University, One John Marshall Dr., Huntington, WV 25755, United States. Electronic address: gresham11@marshall.edu.
Kimberly Broedel-ZauggDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Administration, & Research, School of Pharmacy, Marshall University, One John Marshall Dr., Huntington, WV 25755, United States. Electronic address: broedelzaugg@marshall.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPharmacy student-perceived stress may impact academic experiences. This research aimed to investigate whether there was an increase in student-perceived stress due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsCurrent pharmacy students were surveyed in May 2020 at a public pharmacy school that utilizes an active learning design and follows a flipped classroom approach. In addition to measuring perceived stress, the survey measured coping behaviors, self-efficacy, and emotional status. The collected data were compared with archived data that were collected for internal use in 2018. Student's t-test analyses were used to compare 2020 with 2018 data.

resultsA total of 66 students completed the 2020 survey (response rate 26.2%) and 192 students completed the 2018 survey (response rate 63.2%). On a scale from 0 (never or not applicable) to 5 (multiple times each day), average student-perceived stress was 1.75 (SD = 0.93) in 2020. This value of perceived stress presented a slight, but not statistically significant, reduction from 1.85 (SD = 1.04) in 2018. Comparing 2018 and 2020 datasets showed no significant differences in coping behavior, self-efficacy, or emotional status.

conclusionsBased on the sample with the lower response rate that completed the survey in 2020, student-perceived stress did not increase during online, remote learning associated with the COVID-19 pandemic as compared to the sample with a higher response rate prior to the pandemic. Perhaps the COVID-19 related changes were seamless to students due to their aptitude for remote, online learning.

Indexed as

AdultCOVID-19Education, DistanceFemaleHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Self EfficacyStress, PsychologicalStudents, PharmacySurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19Perceived stressPharmacy studentsRemote learningSelf-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID34294256
PMCPMC9761063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.