Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34294096›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2021

Retinoblastoma genetics screening and clinical management.

Himika Gupta, Sivasankar Malaichamy, Ashwin Mallipatna, Sakthivel Murugan, Nallathambi Jeyabalan, Vishnu Suresh Babu, Anuprita Ghosh, Arkasubhra Ghosh, Sam Santhosh, Somasekar Seshagiri and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mutational analysis of theFrontiers in medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Himika Gupta *Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, India.
Sivasankar Malaichamy *Medgenome Labs Ltd, Bangalore, India.
Ashwin MallipatnaNarayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, India.
Sakthivel MuruganMedgenome Labs Ltd, Bangalore, India.
Nallathambi JeyabalanGrow Lab, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, India.
Vishnu Suresh BabuGrow Lab, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, India.
Anuprita GhoshGrow Lab, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, India.
Arkasubhra GhoshGrow Lab, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, India.
Sam SanthoshMedgenome Labs Ltd, Bangalore, India.
Somasekar SeshagiriGenentech, San Francisco, USA.
Vedam L RamprasadMedgenome Labs Ltd, Bangalore, India.
Govindasamy KumaramanickavelGrow Lab, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, India. gkumarmvel@gmail.com.
Narayana Nethralaya · INSciGenom Labs (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndia accounts for 20% of the global retinoblastoma (RB) burden. However, the existing data on RB1 gene germline mutations and its influence on clinical decisions is minimally explored.

methodsFifty children with RB underwent complete clinical examination and appropriate multidisciplinary management. Screening of germline RB1 gene mutations was performed through next-generation sequencing and Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) analysis. The mutation and non-mutation groups were compared for clinical parameters especially severity, progression and recurrence.

resultsTwenty-nine patients had bilateral RB (BLRB) and 21 had unilateral RB (ULRB). The genetic analysis revealed 20 RB1 variations in 29 probands, inclusive of 3 novel mutations, known 16 mutations and heterozygous whole gene deletions. The mutation detection rate (MDR) was 86.2% in BLRB and 19% in ULRB. Associations of disease recurrence (p = 0.021), progression (p = 0.000) and higher percentage of optic nerve invasion, subretinal seeds and high-risk pathological factors were observed in the mutation group. Clinical management was influenced by the presence of germline mutations, particularly while deciding on enucleation, frequency of periodic follow up and radiotherapy.

conclusionsWe identified novel RB1 mutations, and our mutation detection rate was on par with the previous global studies. In our study, genetic results influenced clinical management and we suggest that it should be an essential and integral component of RB-care in India and elsewhere.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingRetinoblastomaRetinoblastoma Binding ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGerm-Line MutationHumansInfantMaleRB1 protein, humanRetinoblastoma Binding ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID34294096
PMCPMC8296631
OpenAlexW3186170399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.