ArticleBMC medical imaging2021
Retroperitoneum ganglioneuroma: imaging features and surgical outcomes of 35 cases at a Chinese Institution.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-term perioperative safety and long-term follow-up after robotic-assisted resection of non-renal, non-adrenal retroperitoneal tumors: a 10-year retrospective cohort study.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Article
- Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Management of Recurrent Unresectable Retroperitoneal Ganglioneuroma.Cureus · 2026Article
- Imaging of synchronous multifocal renal masses: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Retroperitoneal ganglioneuroma with ectopic inferior vena cava invasion: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Preoperative differentiation of retroperitoneal ganglioneuroma and schwannoma using an ultrasonography-based multivariable model and simplified score: development and single-center internal validation.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Total laparoscopic excision of pelvic retroperitoneal ganglioneuroma: a case report and review of the literature.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Adolescent thoracic scoliosis due to giant ganglioneuroma: a two-case report and literature review.Nagoya journal of medical science · 2024Review
- Giant ganglioneuroma of the mediastinum: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- A case report of multimodal ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of giant retroperitoneal ganglioneuroma.Cancer innovation · 2023Article
- Article
- Imaging of Ganglioneuroma: A Literature Review and a Rare Case of Cystic Presentation in an Adolescent Girl.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Diagnosis and surgical treatment of adrenal ganglioneuroma: a retrospective cohort study of 51 patients in a single center.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe preoperative evaluation is crucial for diagnosis and surgical plan of retroperitoneum ganglioneuroma (GN). In this study, we reviewed a relatively large series of histopathological proved retroperitoneum GN cases, summarized the imaging features and further depicted risk factors of increased surgical blood loss.
methodsA total of 35 (18 male, 17 female) patients were retrospectively enrolled from January 2012 to June 2019 at our institution. Among them, 24 patients had undergone CT scans and 19 patients had undergone MR examination before treatment. The clinical and radiological features were analyzed and the relationships between image features and surgical blood loss were evaluated.
resultsThe media age of the involved 35 patients was 40 years (range, 14-66 years). The histological tumor size was 10.12 ± 4.56 cm for average. Retroperitoneum GN was relatively low density on unenhanced CT images and showed delayed progressive enhancement on enhanced CT and MR images. The whorled sign could be seen in 14 patients. The vessel encasement sign could be found in 17 patients. Univariate analysis revealed maximal tumor size measured on axial image, maximal tumor size measured on coronal image, encasing one or both renal pedicles, encasing the aorta and/or vena cava and whorled sign on MRI showed significant difference between the blood loss ≥ 400 ml and blood loss < 400 ml group. Logistic regression further detected that maximal tumor size measured on axial images (OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.02-1.24; P = 0.023) and encasing one or both renal pedicles (OR: 22.39; 95% CI: 1.35-372.99; P = 0.030) were independently correlated with surgical blood loss.
conclusionsPreoperative CT and MR imaging analysis was valuable for both diagnosis and surgical risk prediction of retroperitoneum GN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.