ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021
GAT-LI: a graph attention network based learning and interpreting method for functional brain network classification.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The diagnosis of ASD with MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluation of Risk of Bias in Neuroimaging-Based Artificial Intelligence Models for Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2023Pooled it
- Using deep learning to identify brain networks mediating cognitive and motor impairments in alcohol use disorder.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- A functional system-informed graph neural network framework to quantify interpretable brain dysfunction in ASD.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society · 2026Article
- Conditioned Graph Reconstruction of Brain Functional Network Connectivity Reveals Interpretable Latent Axes of Sex and Fluid Intelligence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Structural connectome analysis using a graph-based deep model for prediction of non-imaging variables.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Structural Connectome Analysis using a Graph-based Deep Model for Prediction of Non-Imaging Variables.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Graph Neural Networks and Multimodal DTI Features for Schizophrenia Classification: Insights from Brain Network Analysis and Gene Expression.Neuroscience bulletin · 2025Article
- Brain-Cognition Fingerprinting via Graph-GCCA with Contrastive Learning.Machine learning in clinical neuroimaging : 7th international workshop, MLCN 2024, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2024, Marrakesh, Morocco, October 10, 2024, proceedings. MLCN (Workshop) (7th : 2024 : Marrakesh, Morocco) · 2025Article
- MJNMF-GAT: Multi-Task Joint Non-Negative Matrix Factorization Graph Attention Network for Understanding Adolescent Neurodevelopment.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2025Article
- Graph Neural Networks in Brain Connectivity Studies: Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- GraphPath: a graph attention model for molecular stratification with interpretability based on the pathway-pathway interaction network.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- NF-GAT: A Node Feature-Based Graph Attention Network for ASD Classification.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Using Recursive Feature Elimination-Graph Neural Network (RFE-GNN) and Phenotypic Feature Extractor (PFE).Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Multi-Slice Generation sMRI and fMRI for Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis Using 3D-CNN and Vision Transformers.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Heterogeneous Graph Convolutional Neural Network via Hodge-Laplacian for Brain Functional Data.Information processing in medical imaging : proceedings of the ... conference · 2023Article
- Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and their underlying neural mechanisms evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging-based brain connectivity network analyses.European journal of radiology open · 2023Review
- omicsGAT: Graph Attention Network for Cancer Subtype Analyses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Identification of Young High-Functioning Autism Individuals Based on Functional Connectome Using Graph Isomorphism Network: A Pilot Study.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- CNNG: A Convolutional Neural Networks With Gated Recurrent Units for Autism Spectrum Disorder Classification.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAutism spectrum disorders (ASD) imply a spectrum of symptoms rather than a single phenotype. ASD could affect brain connectivity at different degree based on the severity of the symptom. Given their excellent learning capability, graph neural networks (GNN) methods have recently been used to uncover functional connectivity patterns and biological mechanisms in neuropsychiatric disorders, such as ASD. However, there remain challenges to develop an accurate GNN learning model and understand how specific decisions of these graph models are made in brain network analysis.
resultsIn this paper, we propose a graph attention network based learning and interpreting method, namely GAT-LI, which learns to classify functional brain networks of ASD individuals versus healthy controls (HC), and interprets the learned graph model with feature importance. Specifically, GAT-LI includes a graph learning stage and an interpreting stage. First, in the graph learning stage, a new graph attention network model, namely GAT2, uses graph attention layers to learn the node representation, and a novel attention pooling layer to obtain the graph representation for functional brain network classification. We experimentally compared GAT2 model's performance on the ABIDE I database from 1035 subjects against the classification performances of other well-known models, and the results showed that the GAT2 model achieved the best classification performance. We experimentally compared the influence of different construction methods of brain networks in GAT2 model. We also used a larger synthetic graph dataset with 4000 samples to validate the utility and power of GAT2 model. Second, in the interpreting stage, we used GNNExplainer to interpret learned GAT2 model with feature importance. We experimentally compared GNNExplainer with two well-known interpretation methods including Saliency Map and DeepLIFT to interpret the learned model, and the results showed GNNExplainer achieved the best interpretation performance. We further used the interpretation method to identify the features that contributed most in classifying ASD versus HC.
conclusionWe propose a two-stage learning and interpreting method GAT-LI to classify functional brain networks and interpret the feature importance in the graph model. The method should also be useful in the classification and interpretation tasks for graph data from other biomedical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.