Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34294047›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

GAT-LI: a graph attention network based learning and interpreting method for functional brain network classification.

Jinlong Hu, Lijie Cao, Tenghui Li, Shoubin Dong, Ping Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. A functional system-informed graph neural network framework to quantify interpretable brain dysfunction in ASD.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Brain-Cognition Fingerprinting via Graph-GCCA with Contrastive Learning.Machine learning in clinical neuroimaging : 7th international workshop, MLCN 2024, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2024, Marrakesh, Morocco, October 10, 2024, proceedings. MLCN (Workshop) (7th : 2024 : Marrakesh, Morocco) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. NF-GAT: A Node Feature-Based Graph Attention Network for ASD Classification.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Heterogeneous Graph Convolutional Neural Network via Hodge-Laplacian for Brain Functional Data.Information processing in medical imaging : proceedings of the ... conference · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. omicsGAT: Graph Attention Network for Cancer Subtype Analyses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jinlong HuGuangdong Key Lab of Communication and Computer Network, School of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China. jlhu@scut.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3602-7603
Lijie CaoGuangdong Key Lab of Communication and Computer Network, School of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Tenghui LiGuangdong Key Lab of Communication and Computer Network, School of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Shoubin DongGuangdong Key Lab of Communication and Computer Network, School of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Ping LiDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studies, Faculty of Humanities, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, SCUT 2019KZ20the Guangdong Pearl River Talents Plan Innovative and Entrepreneurial Team 2016ZT06S220the Innovation fund of introduced high-end scientific research institutions of Zhongshan 2019AG031the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China 2018A030313309the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China 2021A1515011942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutism spectrum disorders (ASD) imply a spectrum of symptoms rather than a single phenotype. ASD could affect brain connectivity at different degree based on the severity of the symptom. Given their excellent learning capability, graph neural networks (GNN) methods have recently been used to uncover functional connectivity patterns and biological mechanisms in neuropsychiatric disorders, such as ASD. However, there remain challenges to develop an accurate GNN learning model and understand how specific decisions of these graph models are made in brain network analysis.

resultsIn this paper, we propose a graph attention network based learning and interpreting method, namely GAT-LI, which learns to classify functional brain networks of ASD individuals versus healthy controls (HC), and interprets the learned graph model with feature importance. Specifically, GAT-LI includes a graph learning stage and an interpreting stage. First, in the graph learning stage, a new graph attention network model, namely GAT2, uses graph attention layers to learn the node representation, and a novel attention pooling layer to obtain the graph representation for functional brain network classification. We experimentally compared GAT2 model's performance on the ABIDE I database from 1035 subjects against the classification performances of other well-known models, and the results showed that the GAT2 model achieved the best classification performance. We experimentally compared the influence of different construction methods of brain networks in GAT2 model. We also used a larger synthetic graph dataset with 4000 samples to validate the utility and power of GAT2 model. Second, in the interpreting stage, we used GNNExplainer to interpret learned GAT2 model with feature importance. We experimentally compared GNNExplainer with two well-known interpretation methods including Saliency Map and DeepLIFT to interpret the learned model, and the results showed GNNExplainer achieved the best interpretation performance. We further used the interpretation method to identify the features that contributed most in classifying ASD versus HC.

conclusionWe propose a two-stage learning and interpreting method GAT-LI to classify functional brain networks and interpret the feature importance in the graph model. The method should also be useful in the classification and interpretation tasks for graph data from other biomedical scenarios.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrain MappingHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPolymersGATPolymersClassificationFunctional brain networksGraph attention networksModel interpretationResting-state functional connectivity data

Identifiers

PMID34294047
PMCPMC8296748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.