Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34293461›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2021

Combining tumor deposits with the number of lymph node metastases to improve the prognostic accuracy in stage III colon cancer: a post hoc analysis of the CALGB/SWOG 80702 phase III study (Alliance)

R Cohen, Q Shi, J Meyers, Z Jin, M Svrcek, C Fuchs, F Couture, P Kuebler, K K Ciombor, J Bendell and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 16 institutions in 3 countries.

R CohenDepartment of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA; Sorbonne Université, Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Unité Mixte de Recherche Scientifique 938, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Equipe Instabilité des Microsatellites et Cancer, Equipe labellisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Paris, France. Electronic address: romain.cohen@aphp.fr.
Q ShiAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
J MeyersAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Z JinDivision of Oncology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, USA.
M SvrcekSorbonne Université, INSERM, Unité Mixte de Recherche Scientifique 938, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Equipe Instabilité des Microsatellites et Cancer, Equipe labellisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, Department of Pathology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.
C FuchsGenentech, South San Francisco, USA; Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, USA.
F CoutureHôtel-Dieu de Québec, Quebec, Canada.
P KueblerColumbus NCI Community Clinical Oncology Research Program, Columbus, USA.
K K CiomborDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA.
J BendellSarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, USA.
A De Jesus-AcostaDepartment of Medical Oncology, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
P KumarIllinois Cancercare, P.C., Peoria, USA.
D LewisSoutheast Clinical Oncology Research, Cone Health Medical Group, Asheboro, USA.
B TanSiteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA.
M M BertagnolliOffice of the Alliance Group Chair, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
P PhilipDepartment of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA.
C BlankeSWOG Cancer Research Network Group Chair's Office, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, USA.
E M O'ReillyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, USA.
A ShieldsDepartment of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA.
J A MeyerhardtDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USWayne State University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USColumbus Community Clinical Oncology Program · USCone Health · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHôtel-Dieu de Québec · CAIllinois CancerCare · USInserm · FRJohns Hopkins University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USSarah Cannon · USVanderbilt University · USWashington University in St. Louis · USYale Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
Statistics CoreU10CA180882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sumithra Jay Mandrekar · 2014 to 2026
$115.0M
NCIC Clinical Trials Group - Canadian Collaborating Clinical Trials NetworkU10CA180863 · NCI · QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON · PI Janet Ellen Dancey · 2014 to 2026
$40.4M
Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium, Inc. (SCOR)UG1CA189858 · NCI · SOUTHEAST CLINICAL ONCOL RES CONSORTIUM · PI Judith O Hopkins, William J Irvin · 2014 to 2026
$38.8M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY / SITEMAN CANCER CENTER LEAD ACADEMIC SITEUG1CA233339 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI NANCY L BARTLETT, Clifford Grant Robinson · 2019 to 2026
$11.3M
Network Lead Academic Participating Site: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterUG1CA233290 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CAROL AGHAJANIAN, Darren Feldman · 2019 to 2026
$10.2M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareUG1CA233180 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Harold John Burstein · 2019 to 2026
$8.6M
NCI, National Clinical Trials Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAPS) UG1 (funded extension)UG1CA232760 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Judy Caroline Boughey, Aaron Scott Mansfield · 2019 to 2026
$8.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180863NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180882NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189858NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA232760NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233163NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233180NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233196NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233270NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233290NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233337NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn colon cancer, tumor deposits (TD) are considered in assigning prognosis and staging only in the absence of lymph node metastasis (i.e. stage III pN1c tumors). We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the presence and the number of TD in patients with stage III, node-positive colon cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsAll participants from the CALGB/SWOG 80702 phase III trial were included in this post hoc analysis. Pathology reports were reviewed for the presence and the number of TD, lymphovascular and perineural invasion. Associations with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by multivariable Cox models adjusting for sex, treatment arm, T-stage, N-stage, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion and lymph node ratio.

resultsOverall, 2028 patients were included with 524 (26%) TD-positive and 1504 (74%) TD-negative tumors. Of the TD-positive patients, 80 (15.4%) were node negative (i.e. pN1c), 239 (46.1%) were pN1a/b (<4 positive lymph nodes) and 200 (38.5%) were pN2 (≥4 positive lymph nodes). The presence of TD was associated with poorer DFS [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.63, 95% CI 1.33-1.98] and OS (aHR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.24-2.04). The negative effect of TD was observed for both pN1a/b and pN2 groups. Among TD-positive patients, the number of TD had a linear negative effect on DFS and OS. Combining TD and the number of lymph node metastases, 104 of 1470 (7.1%) pN1 patients were re-staged as pN2, with worse outcomes than patients confirmed as pN1 (3-year DFS rate: 65.4% versus 80.5%, P = 0.0003; 5-year OS rate: 87.9% versus 69.1%, P = <0.0001). DFS was not different between patients re-staged as pN2 and those initially staged as pN2 (3-year DFS rate: 65.4% versus 62.3%, P = 0.4895).

conclusionCombining the number of TD and the number of lymph node metastases improved the prognostication accuracy of tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsExtranodal ExtensionHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective Studiesadjuvantcolorectal cancerprognosisstage IIItumor deposit

Identifiers

PMID34293461
PMCPMC8719434
OpenAlexW3184328705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.