Accurate Measurement of Nutrients and Nonnutritive Dietary Ingredients from Dietary Supplements Is Critical in the Precision Nutrition Era.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Methods matter for dietary supplement exposure assessment: comparing prevalence, product types, and amounts of nutrients from dietary supplements in the Interactive Diet and Activity Tracking in the American Association of Retired Persons cohort study.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2025
   Article
2. The Evolution of Science and Regulation of Dietary Supplements: Past, Present, and Future.The Journal of nutrition · 2024
   Review
3. Major Gaps in Understanding Dietary Supplement Use in Health and Disease.Annual review of nutrition · 2023
   Review
4. The Perception of Vitamins and Their Prevalence in Fortified Food and Supplements in Japan.Nutrients · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  A Dietary Supplement Frequency Questionnaire Correctly Ranks Nutrient Intakes in US Older Adults When Compared to a Comprehensive Dietary Supplement Inventory.2021

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as