Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34293029›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

Fungal species in endodontic infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Alice Alberti, Stefano Corbella, Silvio Taschieri, Luca Francetti, Kausar Sadia Fakhruddin, Lakshman Perera Samaranayake

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. PediatricJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. PeerJ · 2025
    Article
  9. Comparative Study ofNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Molecular Identification ofJournal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Antifungal Susceptibility ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Cross-kingdom interaction betweenFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Alice AlbertiDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5017-1340
Stefano CorbellaDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Silvio TaschieriDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Luca FrancettiDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Kausar Sadia FakhruddinCollege of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.
Lakshman Perera SamaranayakeCollege of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.
Sechenov University · RUUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Sharjah · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal infections are common on oral mucosae, but their role in other oral sites is ill defined. Over the last few decades, numerous studies have reported the presence of fungi, particularly Candida species in endodontic infections, albeit in relatively small numbers in comparison to its predominant anaerobic bacteriome. Here, we review the fungal biome of primary and secondary endodontic infections, with particular reference to the prevalence and behavior of Candida species. Meta-analysis of the available data from a total of 39 studies fitting the inclusion criteria, indicate the overall weighted mean prevalence (WMP) of fungal species in endodontic infections to be 9.11% (from a cumulative total of 2003 samples), with 9.0% in primary (n = 1341), and 9.3% in secondary infections (n = 662). Nevertheless, WMP for fungi in primary and secondary infections which were 6.3% and 7.5% for culture-based studies, increased to 12.5% and 16.0% in molecular studies, respectively. The most prevalent fungal species was Candida spp. The high heterogeneity in the reported fungal prevalence suggests the need for standardized sampling, and speciation methods. The advent of the new molecular biological analytical platforms, such as the next generation sequencing (NGS), and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF), that enables identification and quantitation of a broad spectrum of hitherto unknown organisms in endodontic infections should radically alter our understanding of the endodontic mycobiome in the future. Candida spp. appear to be co-pathogens with bacteria in approximately one in ten patients with endodontic infections. Hence, clinicians should comprehend the importance and the role of fungi in endodontic infections and be cognizant of the need to eradicate both bacteria and fungi for successful therapy.

Indexed as

CandidaBacteriaBacterial InfectionsCandidiasisDental Pulp DiseasesHumans

Identifiers

PMID34293029
PMCPMC8297845
OpenAlexW3185811428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.