Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34292942›Full record

ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

A review of the leishmanin skin test: A neglected test for a neglected disease.

Jessica Carstens-Kass, Kayla Paulini, Patrick Lypaczewski, Greg Matlashewski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Humoral and T-Cell-Mediated Immunity AgainstPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. ThePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A neglected among the neglected: a review of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Guatemala.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Montenegro skin test: Distracted by the promise of modernity?Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessica Carstens-KassDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4783-2763
Kayla PauliniDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Patrick LypaczewskiDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5550-712X
Greg MatlashewskiDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8971-5525

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The leishmanin skin test (LST) has been used for decades to detect exposure and immunity to the parasite Leishmania, the causative agent of the neglected tropical disease leishmaniasis. In the LST, Leishmania antigen (leishmanin) is intradermally injected into the forearm. In an individual who has been previously infected, a delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reaction results in a measurable induration at the site of the injection, indicating that previous exposure to Leishmania has resulted in the development of cell-mediated immunity. LST positivity is associated with long-lasting protective immunity against reinfection, most notably as reported for visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Despite efforts over the past few decades, leishmanin antigen is no longer produced under good manufacturing practice (GMP) conditions anywhere in the world. Consequently, the use of the LST in epidemiological studies has declined in favor of serological and molecular tests. In this review, we provide a historical overview of the LST and justification for the reintroduction of leishmanin. A GMP-grade leishmanin can be used to detect immunity in vivo by the LST and can be investigated for use in an interferon-γ release assay (IGRA), which may serve as an in vitro version of the LST. The LST will be a valuable tool for surveillance and epidemiological studies in support of the VL elimination programs and as a surrogate marker of immunity in vaccine clinical trials.

methodsA review of the literature was conducted using PubMed as the primary database, with MeSH terms "leishmanin skin test" OR "Montenegro test" OR "Montenegro skin test." Articles written in English that describe the history or standardization of leishmanin, the use of leishmanin in an IGRA, or the use of the LST in epidemiological studies or vaccine trials were prioritized in our appraisal of the literature.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, ProtozoanHumansImmunity, CellularLeishmaniaLeishmaniasis, CutaneousNeglected DiseasesSkin TestsAntigens, Protozoanleishmanin

Identifiers

PMID34292942
PMCPMC8297750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.