Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34292646›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology2021

A novel undergraduate biomedical laboratory course concept in synergy with ongoing faculty research.

Willemijn D Schot, Maria A Hegeman, Toine Ten Broeke, Floris A Valentijn, Irma Meijerman, Frans J Prins, Wim J A G Dictus, Niels Bovenschen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A novel undergraduate biomedical laboratory course concept in synergy with ongoing faculty research.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Willemijn D SchotEducational Consultancy & Professional Development, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Maria A HegemanEducational Consultancy & Professional Development, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Toine Ten BroekeDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Floris A ValentijnDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3676-6596
Irma MeijermanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Frans J PrinsEducational Consultancy & Professional Development, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Wim J A G DictusCenter for Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Niels BovenschenDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8526-4456
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal integration of education and ongoing faculty research in many undergraduate science programs is limited to the capstone project. Here, we aimed to develop a novel course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) in synergy with ongoing faculty research. This 10-week course called Biomedical Research Lab is embedded in the curriculum of the undergraduate program Biomedical Sciences and grounded in the theoretical framework of research-based learning. Four groups of four students work together in a dedicated laboratory on an actual ongoing research problem of faculty. All groups work on the same research problem, albeit from different (methodological) perspectives, thereby stimulating interdependence between all participants. Students propose new research, execute the experiments, and collectively report in a single research article. According to students, the course enhanced scientific, laboratory, and academic skills. Students appreciated ownership and responsibilities of the research, laboratory teachers as role models, and they were inspired and motivated by doing authentic actual research. The course resulted in a better understanding of what doing research entails. Faculty valued the didactical experience, research output and scouting opportunities. Since topics can change per course edition, we have showcased a widely applicable pedagogy creating synergy between ongoing research and undergraduate education.

Indexed as

LaboratoriesStudentsCurriculumFacultyHumansLearningauthentic researchinquiry-based learningresearch-based learningstudents as partnersundergraduate

Identifiers

PMID34292646
PMCPMC8518899
OpenAlexW3184602832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.