Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34292494›Full record

ArticlePlant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2021

Clinical Study on Plant Galactagogue Worldwide in Promoting Women's Lactation: a Scoping Review.

Soon Hong Kwan, Puteri Shafinaz Abdul-Rahman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04614714 (Nicotinamide Riboside and Milk Production in the NICU), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04614714 phase2 / phase3not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Nicotinamide Riboside and Milk Production in the NICU

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, DavisRan2026 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsPreterm Birth, Inadequate Milk ProductionArmsNicotinamide Riboside (NR), Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Soon Hong KwanMedical Biotechnology Laboratory, Central Research Laboratories, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. sebastiankwan@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1775-4242
Puteri Shafinaz Abdul-RahmanMedical Biotechnology Laboratory, Central Research Laboratories, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. terisar@um.edu.my.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1818-4552

Funding

Institut Pengurusan dan Pemantauan Penyelidikan, Universiti Malaya Bantuan Khas Penyelidikan (BKS001-2021)Universiti Malaya Impact-Oriented Interdisciplinary Research Grant (IIRG032B-2019)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human milk is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the general well-being of infants. However, many mothers face an insufficient milk supply to breastfeed their children. Galactagogue, in particular, plant galactagogue, serves as a method to promote lactation. This in-depth review examines the evidence supporting different plants' galactagogic activity through clinical studies around the globe. A scoping review approach was adopted to establish the research questions, and define the findings, selection and analysis of the study. This scoping review highlights and compiles the clinical research performed globally involving plant galactagogue to better inform the medical practitioners, lactation consultants, nursing mothers, communities and relevant personnel on practicing, guidelines, policymaking and research. In general, a total of 1041 research publications were retrieved from different global bibliographic databases, of which only 13 articles were retained for analysis after applying the exclusion criteria. A total of 14 types of plants have undergone clinical studies in the past decade to verify their galactagogic activity. All but two showed a positive effect on promoting milk production. There were 42 articles categorised as excluded studies. The category includes review articles, surveys, case reports, introductory articles of regional plant galactagogue and preclinical studies, which involves animal testing and the studies exploring other issues related to plant galactagogue. The findings demonstrate that there is a significant research gap on the plant galactagogue using clinical studies. More clinical research is necessary to identify and verify the efficacy of various types of plant galactagogue for the benefit of humankind.

Indexed as

GalactogoguesAnimalsBreast FeedingHumansLactationMilk, HumanGalactogoguesClinicalGalactagogueHumanMilkPlant

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.