Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34292466›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2022

Cross-cultural adaptation of the SWAL-QOL and the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) into French-Canadian and preliminary assessment for their use in an oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD) population.

Claudia Côté, Julie Fortin, Bernard Brais, Sarah Youssof, Cynthia Gagnon

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Claudia CôtéFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada. claudia.cote4@usherbrooke.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2508-2500
Julie FortinGroupe de recherche interdisciplinaire sur les maladies neuromusculaires, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean, Saguenay, Québec, Canada.
Bernard BraisDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Sarah YoussofDepartment of Neurology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Cynthia GagnonFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Université de Sherbrooke · CACentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean · CAMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CAUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatient-reported outcomes (PRO) assessing dysphagia are an essential component of clinical trials to consider how patients feel and function in response to treatments. The selected PRO needs to be translated in several languages using a systematic process ensuring its validity and equivalence for use in multicenter clinical trials. The main objectives were to translate the SWAL-QOL and the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) into French Canadian (SWAL-QOL-FC and SSQ-FC) and to assess their appropriateness for patients with oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD).

methodsA forward- and back-translation process was followed including independent mother-tongue translators followed by committee review. Known-groups validity was assessed by comparing scores of OPMD French-Canadian participants (n = 21) known to differ in dysphagia severity according to the 80-ml drinking test score. A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the mean scores. Cognitive interviews were conducted later on to ensure a posteriori cultural equivalence among French-Canadian participants (n = 28).

resultsEvidences of adequate known-groups validity was shown for the SSQ-FC. Only two domains out of 10 of the SWAL-QOL-FC (burden and eating duration) showed adequate known-groups validity. In addition, the difference in the mean composite score was not significant. Several conceptual equivalence issues were found in both questionnaires as a result of the cognitive interviews.

conclusionThis study provided evidence that the SSQ-FC presents better validity than the SWAL-QOL-FC in a small sample size of OPMD participants. The findings of the cognitive interviews suggest the need to develop an OPMD-specific questionnaire to capture better the whole spectrum of disease severity.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersMuscular Dystrophy, OculopharyngealCanadaCross-Cultural ComparisonHumansLanguageQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesCross-cultural adaptationDysphagiaKnown-groups validityOculopharyngeal muscular dystrophySSQSWAL-QOL

Identifiers

PMID34292466
OpenAlexW3185507761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.