Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34292453›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2021

Evaluation of the InTray and Compact Dry culture systems for the diagnosis of urinary tract infections in patients presenting to primary health clinics in Harare, Zimbabwe.

Ioana D Olaru, Wael Elamin, Mutsawashe Chisenga, Nada Malou, Jeremie Piton, Shunmay Yeung, Rashida A Ferrand, Heidi Hopkins, Prosper Chonzi, Kudzai P E Masunda and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Ioana D OlaruClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. ioana-diana.olaru@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3392-9257
Wael ElaminG42 Healthcare, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Mutsawashe ChisengaBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Nada MalouFIND (Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics), Geneva, Switzerland.
Jeremie PitonFIND (Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics), Geneva, Switzerland.
Shunmay YeungClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Rashida A FerrandClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Heidi HopkinsClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Prosper ChonziCity of Harare, Health Department, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Kudzai P E MasundaCity of Harare, Health Department, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Portia ManangaziraMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Cecilia FerreyraFIND (Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics), Geneva, Switzerland.
Katharina KranzerClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
University of London · GBFIND · CHHarare Institute of Technology · ZWBiomedical Research and Training Institute · ZWMinistry of Health and Child Welfare · ZWQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 206316/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust awarded to the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (grant number 203905/Z/16/Z).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance surveillance data is lacking from many resource-limited settings mainly due to limited laboratory testing. Novel culture systems may address some of the limitations of conventional culture media and expand the availability of microbiology services. The aims of this study were to evaluate the performance of InTray COLOREX Screen/ESBL and Compact Dry for the detection of uropathogens and of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms from urine samples. Urines samples were collected from patients presenting with symptoms of urinary tract infection to primary care clinics in Harare. Performance of the InTray COLOREX Screen, ESBL and Compact Dry chromogenic media were compared to the reference of culture using Brilliance UTI agar and conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing. A total of 414 samples were included in the analysis. Of the included samples, 98 were positive on Brilliance UTI agar and 83 grew Enterobacterales. The sensitivities and specificities for Enterobacterales were 89.2% (95% CI 80.4-94.9) and 98.2% (95% CI 96.1-99.3) for InTray Screen and 95.2% (95% CI 88.1-98.7) and 99.7% (95% CI 98.3-100) for Compact Dry. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases were present in 22 isolates from the Brilliance UTI agar. The sensitivity of the InTray COLOREX ESBL culture plates for the detection of ESBL-producing organisms was 95.5% (95% CI 77.2-99.9) and specificity was 99.5% (95% CI 98.2-99.9%). Our findings show good performance of the novel culture systems for the detection of uropathogens and ESBL-producing organisms. Both systems have several advantages over conventional media and have the potential to expand and decentralize laboratory testing.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesColony Count, MicrobialCommunity Health CentersCross-Sectional StudiesCulture MediaDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterobacteriaceaeFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCulture MediaAMRAntibiotic resistanceEnterobacteralesESBL

Identifiers

PMID34292453
PMCPMC8590652
OpenAlexW3184654160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.