Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34292450›Full record

ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2021

Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in nerve injury repair-a new era in therapeutic agents and regenerative treatments.

Xellen Cunha Muniz, Ana Carolina Correa de Assis, Bruna Stefane Alves de Oliveira, Luiz Fernando Romanholo Ferreira, Muhammad Bilal, Hafiz M N Iqbal, Renato Nery Soriano

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Xellen Cunha MunizDepartment of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, 35032-620, Governador Valadares-MG, Brazil.
Ana Carolina Correa de AssisDepartment of Medicine, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, 35032-620, Governador Valadares-MG, Brazil.
Bruna Stefane Alves de OliveiraDepartment of Medicine, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, 35032-620, Governador Valadares-MG, Brazil.
Luiz Fernando Romanholo FerreiraGraduate Program in Process Engineering, Tiradentes University (UNIT), Av. Murilo Dantas, 300, Farolândia, Aracaju-Sergipe, 49032-490, Brazil.
Muhammad BilalSchool of Life Science and Food Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huaian, 223003, China. bilaluaf@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5388-3183
Hafiz M N IqbalTecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Campus Monterrey, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, CP 64849, Monterrey, N.L., Mexico.
Renato Nery SorianoDivision of Physiology and Biophysics, Department of Basic Life Sciences, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, 35010-177, Governador Valadares-MG, Brazil. renato.soriano@ufjf.edu.br.
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora · BRHuaiyin Institute of Technology · CNTecnológico de Monterrey · MXUniversidade Tiradentes · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraumatic nerve injuries may result in severe motor dysfunctions. Although the microenvironment of peripheral axons favors their regeneration, regenerative process is not always successful. PURPOSE: We reviewed and discussed the main findings obtained with low-level laser therapy (LLLT), a therapeutic intervention that has been employed in order to achieve an optimized regeneration process in peripheral axons. SCOPE: Disseminating the best available evidence for the effectiveness of this therapeutic strategy can potentially improve the statistics of success in the clinical treatment of nerve injuries. We found evidence that LLLT optimizes the regeneration of peripheral axons, improving motor function, especially in animal models. Nonetheless, further clinical evidence is still needed before LLLT can be strongly recommended. Although the results are promising, the elucidation of the mechanisms of action and safety assessment are necessary to support highquality clinical studies.

conclusionThe present careful compilation of findings with consistent pro-regenerative evidence and published in respected scientific journals can be valuable for health professionals and researchers in the field, possibly contributing to achieve more promising results in future randomized controlled trials and interventions, providing better prognosis for clinical practice.

Indexed as

Low-Level Light TherapyPeripheral Nerve InjuriesAnimalsAxonsHumansModels, AnimalNerve RegenerationAxon regenerationPeripheral axonPhotobiomodulationPro-regenerative interventions

Identifiers

PMID34292450
OpenAlexW3183930146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.