Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34292380›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2021

Intraoperative virtual reality distraction in TKA under spinal anesthesia: a preliminary study.

H Peuchot, R Khakha, V Riera, M Ollivier, J-N Argenson

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Immersive Virtual Reality for Postoperative Pain Among Older Adults: A Scoping Review.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

H PeuchotInstitute for Locomotion, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, Sainte-Marguerite Hospital, 270, boulevard Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.
R KhakhaGuys and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, England.
V RieraInstitute for Locomotion, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, Sainte-Marguerite Hospital, 270, boulevard Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.
M OllivierInstitute for Locomotion, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, Sainte-Marguerite Hospital, 270, boulevard Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.
J-N ArgensonInstitute for Locomotion, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, Sainte-Marguerite Hospital, 270, boulevard Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France. jean-noel.argenson@ap-hm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0879-7803

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe effect of patient anxiety during the perioperative period has been shown to be of great importance in its influence on post-operative recovery. Over the last 10 years, virtual reality (VR) has been developed in anesthesia for patient's distraction by immersion. The aim of this study was to evaluate post-operative patient anxiety the day after TKA surgery under spinal anesthesia (SA) with or without VR distraction. MATERIALS AND

methodsA single-center, prospective cohort study was performed looking at patients undergoing TKA surgery under SA with a VR headset (group 1) compared with those undergoing the same procedure with standard protocol (group 2). Data using a validated scoring system looking at patient anxiety (STAI Y-1) were collected. Secondary endpoints were need for sedation during surgery, intraoperative complications (hypotension and oxygen need), postoperative pain and comfort scores (VAS) and patient satisfaction.

resultsTen patients (group 1) received the VR headset during surgery and 10 (group 2) received the standard protocol established in our center. Average age was 73 years old. No difference was found in post-operative patient anxiety regarding to STAI Y-1 score (95% CI - 7 to 10, p = 0.71. There was a decrease of sedation and intra-operative adverse event as hypotension and oxygen requirement in group 1 (p < 0.0001, p = 0.015, p = 0.0054), and a significant increase in comfort score (p = 0.002). No difference in patient satisfaction was found.

conclusionUsing VR for immersive distraction seemed to lead to no difference in patient anxiety in TKA under SA. Intra-operative adverse events were decreased, and post-operative comfort was increased. Patient satisfaction was not modified. This preliminary study is encouraging and gives us arguments to involve larger number of patients while exploring the various possibilities offered by VR.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, SpinalArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeVirtual RealityAgedAnxietyHumansProspective StudiesAnxietySatisfactionSedationTKAVirtual reality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.