Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34292312›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of experimental medicine2021

Microglia in Alzheimer's disease at single-cell level. Are there common patterns in humans and mice?

Yun Chen, Marco Colonna

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of experimental medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 204 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
204citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
22.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

204 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 325 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

144 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yun ChenDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0003-0547-9463
Marco ColonnaDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0001-5222-4987
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

TREM2 IN MICROGLIA BIOLOGY AND ALZHEIMER'S DISEASERF1AG051485 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COLONNA, MARCO · 2015 to 2021
$3.5M
THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES FOR ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE BASED ON TREM2 BIOLOGYRF1AG059082 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COLONNA, MARCO · 2019 to 2019
$2.6M
IMPACT OF NOVEL REGULATORS OF TREM2 EXPRESSION ON ALZHEIMER'S DISEASER21AG059176 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COLONNA, MARCO · 2018 to 2019
$419k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG059176NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG051485NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG059082NIH HHS RF1 AG051485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by extracellular aggregates of amyloid β peptides, intraneuronal tau aggregates, and neuronal death. This pathology triggers activation of microglia. Because variants of genes expressed in microglia correlate with AD risk, microglial response to pathology plausibly impacts disease course. In mouse AD models, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analyses delineated this response as progressive conversion of homeostatic microglia into disease-associated microglia (DAM); additional reactive microglial populations have been reported in other models of neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation. We review all of these microglial signatures, highlighting four fundamental patterns: DAM, IFN-microglia, MHC-II microglia, and proliferating microglia. We propose that all reported microglia populations are either just one or a combination, depending on the clustering strategy applied and the disease model. We further review single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) data from human AD specimens and discuss reasons for parallels and discrepancies between human and mouse transcriptional profiles. Finally, we outline future directions for delineating the microglial impact in AD pathogenesis.

Indexed as

AgingAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalGene ExpressionHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHumansInterferon Type IMiceMicrogliaNeuronsSingle-Cell AnalysisHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIInterferon Type I

Identifiers

PMID34292312
PMCPMC8302448
OpenAlexW3185694768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.