Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34291891›Full record

ArticleNursing open2021

Development and psychometric evaluation of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale.

Fanny Larsson, Åsa Engström, Ulrica Strömbäck, Silje Gustafsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Turkish validity and reliability study of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Perception of feeling safe perioperatively: a concept analysis.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fanny LarssonDivision of Nursing and Medical Technology, Department of Health Science, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9549-2663
Åsa EngströmDivision of Nursing and Medical Technology, Department of Health Science, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6244-6401
Ulrica StrömbäckDivision of Nursing and Medical Technology, Department of Health Science, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8842-7759
Silje GustafssonDivision of Nursing and Medical Technology, Department of Health Science, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8990-752X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study is to develop and psychometrically test the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale.

designThe study design was non-experimental and cross-sectional.

methodThe evaluation followed classical test theory, and the instrument was evaluated regarding reliability, construct validity and content validity. For the reliability analysis, a postal questionnaire consisting of the 16 items of the scale was dispatched in March 2020 to a consecutive sample (N = 242) of patients who had undergone hip or knee replacement arthroplasties with regional anaesthesia. Five experts in nursing care evaluated the content validity of the scale.

resultInternal consistency was 0.841. Three items were excluded due to deficits in reliability, resulting in a 13-item scale. A principal component analysis revealed a two-dimensional solution, labelled internal and external aspects of feeling safe. Two items were rephrased to improve clarity and content validity. The average content validity for the scale was 0.88, indicating acceptable content validity.

Indexed as

Nursing CareCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesdimensions of safetyfeeling safeinstrument developmentnursingpatient safetyperioperative periodpsychometric evaluationregional anaesthesiasafetysurgery

Identifiers

PMID34291891
PMCPMC8363413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.