Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34291882›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2021

Ethnoveterinary botanical survey of medicinal plants used in Pashto, Punjabi and Saraiki communities of Southwest Pakistan.

Sheikh Zain Ul Abidin, Afifa Munem, Raees Khan, Gaber El-Saber Batiha, Mushtaq Amhad, Muhammad Zafar, Atif Ali Khan Khalil, Helal F Hetta, Mohamed H Mahmoud, Abdus Sami and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Standard medical ethnobotany of Kohistan, North Pakistan.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sheikh Zain Ul AbidinInstitute of Biological Sciences (Botany Program), Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan.
Afifa MunemDepartment of Zoology, Qurtuba University of Science and Information Technology, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan.
Raees KhanDepartment of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Gaber El-Saber BatihaDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Damanhour, Egypt.
Mushtaq AmhadDepartment of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad ZafarDepartment of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Atif Ali Khan KhalilDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Helal F HettaDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Mohamed H MahmoudDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdus SamiDepartment of Zoology, Qurtuba University of Science and Information Technology, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan.
Muhammad Zeeshan BhattiDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-0532-0532

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicinal plants are highly used in the ethnoveterinary practice as considerable livestock resources in remote areas. The aim of the present study is to explore the ethnoveterinary medicinal practices in three different communities and discuss the cross-cultural consensus on the usage of medicinal plants for the treatment of animals. The field survey was conducted by the animal healers of the area during the different seasons of plant growth. A total of 83 informants were interviewed through Semi-structured interview involving experts of traditional knowledge in 21 localities of the three regions (Zhob, D. I. Khan and Mianwali) were conducted. Findings of the study were quantitatively analyzed through the informant consensus factors to identify the homogeneity information provided by the informants. Furthermore, cross-culture consensuses were analyzed and recorded data were represented in a tabulated and Venn diagrams. In particularly, 59 species of plants were documented in the comparative analysis. Among them, 32 plant species were recorded in Pashto community, while Punjabi and Sarakai communities exhibited nine and four plant species, respectively. Whereas cross-cultural analysis showed 14 medicinal plants that were commonly utilized by three different ethnic communities, that indicated low interregional consensus in regard to ethnoveterinary practices of medicinal plants. The current study showed that different communities and ethnic groups sharing some traditional knowledge and cross-culturally approaches have been reported from traditional uses of plants against livestock's diseases. Therefore, current findings are the opportunities to scrutinize the plants for the discovery of new drug sources for humans and animals.

Indexed as

Plants, MedicinalAnimalsEthnicityHumansLivestockPakistanPhytotherapyethnic communitiesethnoveterinarymedicinal plantstraditional knowledge

Identifiers

PMID34291882
PMCPMC8464251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.