Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34291813›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2021

Interventions for the treatment of persistent post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction.

Lisa O'Byrne, Katie E Webster, Samuel MacKeith, Carl Philpott, Claire Hopkins, Martin J Burton

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04789499 phase2completednot on this map

Smell in Covid-19 and Efficacy of Nasal Theophylline

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2021 to 2021Enrolled51ConditionsCovid19, Anosmia, Olfactory Disorder, Covid-19 PandemicArmsTheophylline Powder, Placebo Comparator
NCT05177445 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Phototherapy in the Treatment of Loss of Smell Post Acute Infection of Coronavirus 19

TypeinterventionalSponsorRespiralabRan2022 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsSmell DisordersArmsPhototherapy, OT+Corticosteroids
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. ESCMID rapid guidelines for assessment and management of long COVID.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Effect of drug therapies on self-reported chemosensory outcomes after COVID-19.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2024
    Article
  12. Recovery rates and long-term olfactory dysfunction following COVID-19 infection.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. COCOS trial:BMJ open · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisa O'ByrneDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Katie E WebsterCochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Samuel MacKeithOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Carl PhilpottDepartment of Medicine, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Claire HopkinsENT Department, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Martin J BurtonCochrane UK, Oxford, UK.
Cochrane · GBGuy's Hospital · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSt. Vincent's University Hospital · IEUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR132103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlfactory dysfunction is an early and sensitive marker of COVID-19 infection. Although self-limiting in the majority of cases, when hyposmia or anosmia persists it can have a profound effect on quality of life. Little guidance exists on the treatment of post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction, however several strategies have been proposed from the evidence relating to the treatment of post-viral anosmia (such as medication or olfactory training).

objectivesTo assess the effects (benefits and harms) of interventions that have been used, or proposed, to treat persisting olfactory dysfunction due to COVID-19 infection. A secondary objective is to keep the evidence up-to-date, using a living systematic review approach.  SEARCH

methodsThe Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register; Cochrane ENT Register; CENTRAL; Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished studies. The date of the search was 16 December 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials including participants who had symptoms of olfactory disturbance following COVID-19 infection. Only individuals who had symptoms for at least four weeks were included in this review. Studies compared any intervention with no treatment or placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. Primary outcomes were the recovery of sense of smell, disease-related quality of life and serious adverse effects. Secondary outcomes were the change in sense of smell, general quality of life, prevalence of parosmia and other adverse effects (including nosebleeds/bloody discharge). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. MAIN

resultsWe included one study with 18 participants, which compared the use of a 15-day course of oral steroids combined with nasal irrigation (consisting of an intranasal steroid/mucolytic/decongestant solution) with no intervention. Psychophysical testing was used to assess olfactory function at baseline, 20 and 40 days. Systemic corticosteroids plus intranasal steroid/mucolytic/decongestant compared to no intervention Recovery of sense of smell was assessed after 40 days (25 days after cessation of treatment) using the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center (CCCRC) score. This tool has a range of 0 to 100, and a score of ≥ 90 represents normal olfactory function. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of this intervention on recovery of the sense of smell at one to three months (5/9 participants in the intervention group scored ≥ 90 compared to 0/9 in the control group; risk ratio (RR) 11.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 173.66; 1 study; 18 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Change in sense of smell was assessed using the CCCRC score at 40 days. This study reported an improvement in sense of smell in the intervention group from baseline (median improvement in CCCRC score 60, interquartile range (IQR) 40) compared to the control group (median improvement in CCCRC score 30, IQR 25) (1 study; 18 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Serious adverse events andother adverse events were not identified in any participants of this study; however, it is unclear how these outcomes were assessed and recorded (1 study; 18 participants; very low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is very limited evidence available on the efficacy and harms of treatments for persistent olfactory dysfunction following COVID-19 infection. However, we have identified other ongoing trials in this area. As this is a living systematic review we will update the data regularly, as new results become available. For this (first) version of the living review we identified only one study with a small sample size, which assessed systemic steroids and nasal irrigation (intranasal steroid/mucolytic/decongestant). However, the evidence regarding the benefits and harms from this intervention to treat persistent post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction is very uncertain.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAmbroxolBetamethasoneBiasCOVID-19ExpectorantsGlucocorticoidsHumansNasal DecongestantsNasal LavageOlfaction DisordersPrednisonePrevalenceQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionSmellAmbroxolBetamethasoneExpectorantsGlucocorticoidsNasal DecongestantsPrednisone

Identifiers

PMID34291813
PMCPMC8406942
OpenAlexW3135636229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.