Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34291683›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive care medicine2021

Developing an Innovative System of Open and Flexible, Patient-Family-Centered, Virtual Visiting in ICU During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Collaboration of Staff, Patients, Families, and Technology Companies.

Kathleen A S Thomas, Bernadine F O'Brien, Agatha T Fryday, Ellen C Robinson, Marissa J L Hales, Sofia Karipidis, Aaron Chadwick, Kimberley J Fleming, Alan P Davey-Quinn

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive care medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Family experiences and perceptions of intensive care unit care and communication during the COVID-19 pandemic.Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathleen A S ThomasDepartment of Intensive Care, College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8189-5042
Bernadine F O'BrienDepartment of Intensive Care, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Agatha T FrydayDepartment of Intensive Care, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Ellen C RobinsonDepartment of Intensive Care, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Marissa J L HalesDepartment of Intensive Care, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Sofia KaripidisDepartment of Intensive Care, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Aaron ChadwickDepartment of Intensive Care, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Kimberley J FlemingDepartment of Intensive Care, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Alan P Davey-QuinnDepartment of Intensive Care, College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Wollongong Hospital · AUCollege of Intensive Care Medicine · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic strike at the very core of our humanity as the inability of family to sit at the bedside of their loved ones when battling for their lives in the ICU. Virtual visiting is one tool to help deal with this challenge. When introducing virtual visiting into our ICU, we identified 5 criteria for a sustainable system that aligned with patient-family-centered care: virtual visiting needed to (1) simulate open and flexible visiting; (2) be able to accommodate differences in family size, dynamics, and cultural practices; (3) utilize a video conferencing platform that is private and secure; (4) be easy to use and not require special teams to facilitate meetings; and (5) not increase the workload of ICU staff. There is a growing body of literature demonstrating a global movement toward virtual visiting in ICU, however there are no publications that describe a system which meet all 5 of our criteria. Importantly, there are no papers describing systems of virtual visiting which mimic open and flexible family presence at the bedside. We were unable to find any off-the-shelf video conferencing platforms that met all our criteria. To come up with a solution, a multidisciplinary team of ICU staff partnered with healthcare technology adoption consultants and two technology companies to develop an innovative system called HowRU. HowRU uses the video conferencing platform Webex with the integration of some newly designed software that automates many of the laborious and complex processes. HowRU is a cloud based, supported, and simplified system that closely simulates open and flexible visiting while ensuring patient and family privacy, dignity, and security. We have demonstrated the transferability of HowRU by implanting it into a second ICU. HowRU is now commercially available internationally. We hope HowRU will improve patient-family-centered care in ICU.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHumansIntensive Care UnitsSARS-CoV-2TechnologyCOVID-19HowRUintensive care unitopen and flexible visitingpatient-family-centered carepatient family communicationpatient-family connecttailored system of virtual visitingvideo conferencingvirtual visitingvisitor restrictions

Identifiers

PMID34291683
PMCPMC8311505
OpenAlexW3186232068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.