Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34291585›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2021

Early detection of metastatic uveal melanoma by the analysis of tumor-specific mutations in cell-free plasma DNA.

Claudia H D Le Guin, Norbert Bornfeld, Nikolaos E Bechrakis, Leyla Jabbarli, Heike Richly, Dietmar R Lohmann, Michael Zeschnigk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Blood-Based Cell-Free DNA in Ophthalmic Oncology.Translational vision science & technology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA as a Liquid Biomarker in Uveal Melanoma.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Detection of metastases using circulating tumour DNA in uveal melanoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claudia H D Le GuinDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6088-6929
Norbert BornfeldDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Nikolaos E BechrakisDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Leyla JabbarliDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Heike RichlyDepartment of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Dietmar R LohmannInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Michael ZeschnigkInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
University of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

DEUTSCHE KREBSHILFE 110962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEye salvaging therapy of malignant melanomas of the uvea can preserve the eye in most cases, but still about half of patients die from metastatic disease. Previous analyses of cell-free DNA from plasma had shown detectable levels of tumor-specific GNAQ/GNA11 mutations in patients with the clinical diagnosis of progressive disease. However, data on the time span that elapses from the detection of ctDNA in plasma to the clinical detection of metastases (diagnostic lead time) are missing.

methodsWe examined 135 patients with uveal melanoma. Cell-free DNA was isolated from a total of 807 blood samples which were taken over a period of up to 41 months and analyzed for the presence of GNAQ/GNA11 mutations by deep amplicon sequencing.

resultsTwenty-one of the 135 patients developed metastases or recurrence. A ctDNA signal was identified in the plasma of 17 of the 21 patients. In 10 patients, this ctDNA signal preceded the clinical diagnosis of metastasis by 2-10 months. In 10 other patients, a ctDNA signal was only detected in samples obtained shortly before or after radiotherapy. The presence of a ctDNA signal in 16 of the remaining 125 patients was linked to clinical manifestation of metastases (n = 14) or tumor recurrence (n = 2) with a sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 96%, respectively.

conclusionDetection of ctDNA in plasma can provide a diagnostic lead time over the clinical diagnosis of metastases or tumor recurrence. Longer lead times are to be expected if intervals between sampling are shortened.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisUveal MelanomaUveal NeoplasmsCirculating Tumor DNAcell-free DNAcell-free tumor DNAdeep amplicon sequencingGNAQ/GNA11oncogenic mutationsuveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID34291585
PMCPMC8419753
OpenAlexW3184734912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.