ArticleThoracic cancer2021
Feasibility and reliability of evaluate PD-L1 expression determination using small biopsy specimens in non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intratumor immune heterogeneity across simulated core biopsy sizes in non-small cell lung cancer: an exploratory study.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Unraveling the complexity of PD-L1 assays: a descriptive review of the methodology, scoring, and practical implications.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Association of PD-L1 expression with driver gene mutations and clinicopathological characteristics in non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world study of 10 441 patients.Thoracic cancer · 2024Article
- Diagnostic biopsy does not accurately reflect the PD-L1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Article
- NSCLC in the Era of Targeted and Immunotherapy: What Every Pulmonologist Must Know.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Feasibility and reliability of evaluate PD-L1 expression determination using small biopsy specimens in non-small cell lung cancer.Thoracic cancer · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProgrammed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) is a useful biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who would probably benefit from immunotherapy. In most patients with advanced stage NSCLC, only small biopsy specimens were available for the evaluation of PD-L1 expression. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility and reliability of PD-L1 testing on small biopsy samples.
methodsSmall specimens of advanced NSCLC patients obtained via endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), endobronchial biopsy (EBB), or computed tomography (CT)-guided core-needle biopsy were collected. Tumor cell count and tissue sufficiency for PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) were evaluated and compared. The clinical course of patients who received immunotherapy in the study population was also examined.
resultsTissue acquisitions for PD-L1 testing in three groups were all above 90%, with no statistically significant differences. The PD-L1 expressions levels were concordant in most patients with more than one sample (8/11). In the EBB group, PD-L1-positive patients had higher objective response rate (ORR) (53.2% vs. 26.9%, p = 0.048) and longer progression-free survival (PFS) (312 vs. 179 days, p = 0.035) than PD-L1 negative patients. In the core needle biopsy group, patients with positive PD-L1 expression also trended to have higher ORR and longer PFS. However, in the EBUS-TBNA group, both ORR and PFS were similar between patients with positive or negative PD-L1 expression.
conclusionsThis study showed that EBUS-TBNA, EBB, and core needle biopsy provides adequate samples for PD-L1 testing. The predictive value of PD-L1 expression on different small samples still warrants further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.