ArticleClinical & experimental ophthalmology2021
How can we improve the quality of cataract services for all? A global scoping review.
Article in Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Visual acuity outcome and complications of cataract surgery in Nigeria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International health · 2026Pooled it
- Characteristics and Factors of Incision-Related Descemet Membrane Detachment During Cataract Surgery: A Prospective Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- A global scoping review of clinical practice guidelines for cataract surgery.AJO international · 2026Review
- Cataract Surgery in Cognitive Impairment: Navigating the Accessibility Challenge in European Healthcare.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Review
- Predictors of time to recovery from cataract surgery among cataract patients at Menelik II Comprehensive Specialized Hospital: a retrospective follow up study.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Automated Imaging of Cataract Surgery Using Artificial Intelligence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Strategies to address inequity of uncorrected refractive error in the Western Pacific: A modified Delphi process.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2024Article
- Assessment of eye health programme reach by comparison with rapid assessment of avoidable blindness (RAAB) survey data, Talagang, Pakistan.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Ultraviolet B radiation induces oxidative stress and apoptosis in human lens epithelium cells by activating NF-κB signaling to down-regulate sodium vitamin C transporter 2 (SVCT2) expression.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2023Article
- The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: Report 9, Risk factors for posterior capsule opacification.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- Comparison of dynamic defocus curve on cataract patients implanting extended depth of focus and monofocal intraocular lens.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2023Article
- Aberrant expression ofInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Effective cataract surgical coverage in adults aged 50 years and older: estimates from population-based surveys in 55 countries.The Lancet. Global health · 2022Article
- A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cataract: Evidence to Support the Development of the WHO Package of Eye Care Interventions.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Addressing the environmental sustainability of eye health-care delivery: a scoping review.The Lancet. Planetary health · 2022Article
- Incidence and risk factors for vitreous loss in residents performing manual small-incision cataract surgery.International journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Measuring cataract outcomes.Community eye health · 2022Article
- Grand Challenges in global eye health: a global prioritisation process using Delphi method.The lancet. Healthy longevity · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCataract is a leading cause of blindness and vision impairment globally. Cataract surgery is one of the most frequently performed operations worldwide, but good quality services are not universally available. This scoping review aims to summarise the nature and extent of published literature on interventions to improve the quality of services for age-related cataract globally.
methodsWe used the dimensions of quality adopted by WHO-effectiveness, safety, people-centredness, timeliness, equity, integration and efficiency-to which we added planetary health. On 17 November 2019, we searched MEDLINE, Embase and Global Health for manuscripts published since 1990, without language or geographic restrictions. We included studies that reported quality-relevant interventions and excluded studies focused on technical aspects of surgery or that only involved children (younger than 18 years). Screening of titles/abstracts, full-text review and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. Studies were grouped thematically and results synthesised narratively.
resultsMost of the 143 included studies were undertaken in high-income countries (n = 93, 65%); 29 intervention groups were identified, most commonly preoperative education (n = 17, 12%) and pain/anxiety management (n = 16, 11%). Efficiency was the quality element most often assessed (n = 58, 41%) followed by people-centredness (n = 40, 28%), while integration (n = 4) and timeliness (n = 3) were infrequently reported, and no study reported outcomes related to planetary health.
conclusionEvidence on interventions to improve quality of cataract services shows unequal regional distribution. There is an urgent need for more evidence relevant to low- and middle-income countries as well as across all quality elements, including planetary health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.