ArticleProteins2022
Improving protein tertiary structure prediction by deep learning and distance prediction in CASP14.
Article in Proteins, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Boosting AlphaFold protein tertiary structure prediction through MSA engineering and extensive model sampling and ranking in CASP16.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Deep Learning for Genomics: From Early Neural Nets to Modern Large Language Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Precision Oncology Comes of Age: Designing Best-in-Class Small Molecules by Integrating Two Decades of Advances in Chemistry, Target Biology, and Data Science.Cancer discovery · 2023Article
- Improving AlphaFold2-based protein tertiary structure prediction with MULTICOM in CASP15.Communications chemistry · 2023Article
- Critical Assessment of Methods for Predicting the 3D Structure of Proteins and Protein Complexes.Annual review of biophysics · 2023Review
- Combining pairwise structural similarity and deep learning interface contact prediction to estimate protein complex model accuracy in CASP15.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Hierarchical deep learning for predicting GO annotations by integrating protein knowledge.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Homology Modelling, Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies of CALMH1 against Secondary Metabolites ofBrain sciences · 2022Article
- SPOT-Contact-LM: improving single-sequence-based prediction of protein contact map using a transformer language model.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Distance-based reconstruction of protein quaternary structures from inter-chain contacts.Proteins · 2022Article
- Improving protein tertiary structure prediction by deep learning and distance prediction in CASP14.Proteins · 2022Article
- Using metagenomic data to boost protein structure prediction and discovery.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Combining Cryo-EM Density Map and Residue Contact for Protein Secondary Structure Topologies.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- AlphaFold 2: Why It Works and Its Implications for Understanding the Relationships of Protein Sequence, Structure, and Function.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2021Article
- Deep Learning-Based Advances in Protein Structure Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Incorporating Machine Learning into Established Bioinformatics Frameworks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Substantial progresses in protein structure prediction have been made by utilizing deep-learning and residue-residue distance prediction since CASP13. Inspired by the advances, we improve our CASP14 MULTICOM protein structure prediction system by incorporating three new components: (a) a new deep learning-based protein inter-residue distance predictor to improve template-free (ab initio) tertiary structure prediction, (b) an enhanced template-based tertiary structure prediction method, and (c) distance-based model quality assessment methods empowered by deep learning. In the 2020 CASP14 experiment, MULTICOM predictor was ranked seventh out of 146 predictors in tertiary structure prediction and ranked third out of 136 predictors in inter-domain structure prediction. The results demonstrate that the template-free modeling based on deep learning and residue-residue distance prediction can predict the correct topology for almost all template-based modeling targets and a majority of hard targets (template-free targets or targets whose templates cannot be recognized), which is a significant improvement over the CASP13 MULTICOM predictor. Moreover, the template-free modeling performs better than the template-based modeling on not only hard targets but also the targets that have homologous templates. The performance of the template-free modeling largely depends on the accuracy of distance prediction closely related to the quality of multiple sequence alignments. The structural model quality assessment works well on targets for which enough good models can be predicted, but it may perform poorly when only a few good models are predicted for a hard target and the distribution of model quality scores is highly skewed. MULTICOM is available at https://github.com/jianlin-cheng/MULTICOM_Human_CASP14/tree/CASP14_DeepRank3 and https://github.com/multicom-toolbox/multicom/tree/multicom_v2.0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.