Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34291346›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Long-term efficacy and safety of 3D printed implant in patients with nasal septal deformities.

Do Hyun Kim, Il Hwan Lee, Won-Soo Yun, Jin-Hyung Shim, Dami Choi, Se Hwan Hwang, Sung Won Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Cartilage · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Do Hyun Kim *Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Banpo-daero 222, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 137-701, Republic of Korea.
Il Hwan Lee *Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Won-Soo YunDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Polytechnic University, Siheung-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, Korea.
Jin-Hyung ShimDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Polytechnic University, Siheung-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, Korea.
Dami ChoiResearch Institute, T&R Biofab Co. Ltd, Siheung-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, Korea.
Se Hwan HwangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 327 Sosa-ro, Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-Do, 14647, Korea. yellobird@catholic.ac.kr.
Sung Won KimDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Banpo-daero 222, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 137-701, Republic of Korea. kswent@catholic.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8981-2536
Tech University of Korea · KRSt. Mary's Hospital · USThe Catholic University of Korea Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2019M3A9H2032424National Research Foundation of Korea 2019M3E5D5064110National Research Foundation of Korea 2020R1I1A1A01051844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of a 3D-printed bioresorbable polycaprolactone (PCL) nasal implant for nasal septal deformity reconstruction.

methodsFourteen patients who had undergone nasal septum reconstruction surgery using 3D-printed PCL nasal septal implants were enrolled. The primary outcome was the change in total Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale scores between postoperative 3 months and current status (3.59 ± 0.51 years). The secondary outcomes were changes in the minimum cross-sectional area (MCA) and volume of both nasal cavities based on acoustic rhinometry, the cross-sectional area of the ostiomeatal unit, and the nasal septum angle of the paranasal sinus (PNS) in computed tomography (CT) images, and a visual analog scale (VAS) of the patients' subjective satisfaction.

resultsThe results showed no significant changes in the MCAs (Cohen's d:0.09; p = 0.711) or nasal volume (Cohen's d:0.26; p = 0.356), the area of the ostiomeatal unit (Cohen's d:0.49; p = 0.064), septum angles (Cohen's d:0.18; p = 0.831), the NOSE scale (Cohen's d:0.14; p = 0.621), or patients' subjective satisfaction (Cohen's d:0.52; p = 0.076) during the follow-up period.

conclusionsThis homogeneous composite microporous PCL nasal septal implant demonstrated long-term clinical efficacy and safety in human tissues that required maintenance of mechanical strength. Therefore, the indications for this implant could extend to various other craniofacial reconstructions in the future.

Indexed as

Nasal ObstructionRhinoplastyHumansNasal SeptumPrinting, Three-DimensionalRhinometry, AcousticTreatment OutcomeNasal SeptumPolycaprolactonePrintingProstheses and ImplantsThree-DimensionalTissue Scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID34291346
OpenAlexW3185889307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.