Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34291294›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2021

Dissociable Components of Information Encoding in Human Perception.

Diego Vidaurre, Radoslaw M Cichy, Mark W Woolrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Aperiodic sleep networks promote memory consolidation.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diego VidaurreDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Center for Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9650-2229
Radoslaw M CichyDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin 14195, Germany.
Mark W WoolrichDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX37JX, UK.

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/K005464/1Medical Research Council MR/L023784/2Wellcome Trust 106183/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain decoding can predict visual perception from non-invasive electrophysiological data by combining information across multiple channels. However, decoding methods typically conflate the composite and distributed neural processes underlying perception that are together present in the signal, making it unclear what specific aspects of the neural computations involved in perception are reflected in this type of macroscale data. Using MEG data recorded while participants viewed a large number of naturalistic images, we analytically decomposed the brain signal into its oscillatory and non-oscillatory components, and used this decomposition to show that there are at least three dissociable stimulus-specific aspects to the brain data: a slow, non-oscillatory component, reflecting the temporally stable aspect of the stimulus representation; a global phase shift of the oscillation, reflecting the overall speed of processing of specific stimuli; and differential patterns of phase across channels, likely reflecting stimulus-specific computations. Further, we show that common cognitive interpretations of decoding analysis, in particular about how representations generalize across time, can benefit from acknowledging the multicomponent nature of the signal in the study of perception.

Indexed as

BrainVisual PerceptionHeadHumansPhotic StimulationMVPAoscillationsstimulus decodingtemporally unconstrained decoding analysisvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID34291294
PMCPMC8568005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.