Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34291153›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2021

Graft Versus Host Disease After Intestinal Transplantation: A Single-center Experience.

Stuart S Kaufman, Elsadig Hussan, Alexander Kroemer, Olga Timofeeva, Helena B Pasieka, Juan Francisco Guerra, Nada A Yazigi, Khalid M Khan, Udeme D Ekong, Sukanya Subramanian and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stuart S KaufmanMedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Elsadig HussanMedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Alexander KroemerMedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Olga TimofeevaGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.
Helena B PasiekaGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.
Juan Francisco GuerraMedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Nada A YazigiMedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Khalid M KhanMedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Udeme D EkongMedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Sukanya SubramanianMedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Jason S HawksworthMedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Raffaelle GirlandaMedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Shahira S GhobrialMedStar Pharmacy, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Thomas M FishbeinMedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Cal S MatsumotoMedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Georgetown University · USMedStar Georgetown University Hospital · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGraft versus host disease (GVHD) is an uncommon but highly morbid complication of intestinal transplantation (ITx). In this study, we reviewed our 17-y experience with GVHD focusing on factors predicting GVHD occurrence and survival.

methodsRetrospective review of 271 patients who received 1 or more ITx since program inception in 2003 with survival analysis using Cox proportional hazard modeling.

resultsOf 271 patients, 28 developed GHVD 34 (18-66) d after ITx presenting with rash or rash with fever in 26, rectosigmoid disease in 1, and hemolysis in 1; other sites, mainly rectosigmoid colon, were involved in 13. Initial skin biopsy demonstrated classic findings in 6, compatible findings in 14, and no abnormalities in 2. Additional sites of GVHD later emerged in 14. Of the 28 patients, 16 died largely from sepsis, the only independent hazard for death (hazard ratio [HR], 37.4181;

conclusionsInitial diagnosis of GVHD after ITx remains largely clinical, supported but not often confirmed by skin biopsy. Although GVHD risk is mainly recipient-driven, changes in donor selection and immunosuppression practice may reduce incidence and improve survival.

Identifiers

PMID34291153
PMCPMC8291352
OpenAlexW3185921948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.