Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34291049›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2021

Direct Neuronal Reprogramming: Bridging the Gap Between Basic Science and Clinical Application.

Lakshmy Vasan, Eunjee Park, Luke Ajay David, Taylor Fleming, Carol Schuurmans

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Biomaterials and cell-based therapy post spinal cord injury.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. NEUROD1 efficiently converts peripheral blood cells into neurons with partial reprogramming by pluripotency factors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lakshmy VasanSunnybrook Research Institute, Biological Sciences Platform, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Eunjee ParkSunnybrook Research Institute, Biological Sciences Platform, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Luke Ajay DavidSunnybrook Research Institute, Biological Sciences Platform, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Taylor FlemingSunnybrook Research Institute, Biological Sciences Platform, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Carol SchuurmansSunnybrook Research Institute, Biological Sciences Platform, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sunnybrook Research InstituteUniversity of Toronto · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct neuronal reprogramming is an innovative new technology that involves the conversion of somatic cells to induced neurons (iNs) without passing through a pluripotent state. The capacity to make new neurons in the brain, which previously was not achievable, has created great excitement in the field as it has opened the door for the potential treatment of incurable neurodegenerative diseases and brain injuries such as stroke. These neurological disorders are associated with frank neuronal loss, and as new neurons are not made in most of the adult brain, treatment options are limited. Developmental biologists have paved the way for the field of direct neuronal reprogramming by identifying both intrinsic cues, primarily transcription factors (TFs) and miRNAs, and extrinsic cues, including growth factors and other signaling molecules, that induce neurogenesis and specify neuronal subtype identities in the embryonic brain. The striking observation that postmitotic, terminally differentiated somatic cells can be converted to iNs by mis-expression of TFs or miRNAs involved in neural lineage development, and/or by exposure to growth factors or small molecule cocktails that recapitulate the signaling environment of the developing brain, has opened the door to the rapid expansion of new neuronal reprogramming methodologies. Furthermore, the more recent applications of neuronal lineage conversion strategies that target resident glial cells

Indexed as

astrocytesdirect neuronal reprogrammingepigeneticsfibroblastslineage conversionmicro-RNAsmall moleculestranscription factors

Identifiers

PMID34291049
PMCPMC8287587
OpenAlexW3187006101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.