Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34290933›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Anomalous Presentation of Venous Malformations in an Adolescent Male.

Cees T Whisonant, Shawhin R Shahriari, Joshua L Harrison, Ashley E Ederle, Gregory L Borah, Anil K Shetty

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cees T WhisonantDivision of Plastics, Hand, Reconstructive & Burn Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, USA.
Shawhin R ShahriariDivision of Plastics, Hand, Reconstructive & Burn Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, USA.
Joshua L HarrisonDivision of Plastics, Hand, Reconstructive & Burn Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, USA.
Ashley E EderleInternal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, USA.
Gregory L BorahDivision of Plastics, Hand, Reconstructive & Burn Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, USA.
Anil K ShettyDivision of Plastics, Hand, Reconstructive & Burn Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, USA.
University of New Mexico · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venous malformations (VMs) may manifest clinically in a broad spectrum. Most VMs are sporadic with previous studies reporting less than 1.2% to be inherited. Conversely, multifocal lesions, such as glomuvenous malformations (GVMs), which have glomus cells in their vascular walls, have been reported to have a frequency of inheritance of 63.8%. Both VMs and GVMs may occur due to sporadic mutation and must be differentiated clinically because this will dictate their proper treatment. Sporadic GVMs involve skin and subcutis, with bluish-purple coloration, are painful to compression, and have no radiographic evidence of phleboliths. Previous studies have demonstrated that VMs are almost always associated with a single lesion that is nontender to compression and are often able to be diagnosed by the presence of phleboliths on radiographic imaging. We present a case of a 14-year-old right-hand-dominant male who presented with two distinct VMs on the dorsum of the right index finger at the proximal and middle phalanges. A previously biopsied lesion overlying the ipsilateral olecranon, which was reported as a possible glomus tumor versus vascular malformation, was present as well. Based on history, physical examination, multicentric presentation, and radiographic findings, the presumptive diagnosis was that the lesions were GVMs. However, after surgical excision and histopathologic examination, the lesions were determined to be VMs because of the absence of glomus cells. Due to the difference in treatment modalities for VMs and GVMs, the ability to accurately diagnose these lesions clinically is essential. This case represents an anomalous presentation of multiple venous malformations occurring in two distinct locations in a 14-year-old boy.

Indexed as

glomuvenous malformationsplastic and reconstructive surgeryplastic surgeryvascular anomaliesvenous malformations

Identifiers

PMID34290933
PMCPMC8288217
OpenAlexW3174530669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.