ArticleCureus2021
Anomalous Presentation of Venous Malformations in an Adolescent Male.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tortuous Ulnar Artery in the Distal Forearm.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous malformations (VMs) may manifest clinically in a broad spectrum. Most VMs are sporadic with previous studies reporting less than 1.2% to be inherited. Conversely, multifocal lesions, such as glomuvenous malformations (GVMs), which have glomus cells in their vascular walls, have been reported to have a frequency of inheritance of 63.8%. Both VMs and GVMs may occur due to sporadic mutation and must be differentiated clinically because this will dictate their proper treatment. Sporadic GVMs involve skin and subcutis, with bluish-purple coloration, are painful to compression, and have no radiographic evidence of phleboliths. Previous studies have demonstrated that VMs are almost always associated with a single lesion that is nontender to compression and are often able to be diagnosed by the presence of phleboliths on radiographic imaging. We present a case of a 14-year-old right-hand-dominant male who presented with two distinct VMs on the dorsum of the right index finger at the proximal and middle phalanges. A previously biopsied lesion overlying the ipsilateral olecranon, which was reported as a possible glomus tumor versus vascular malformation, was present as well. Based on history, physical examination, multicentric presentation, and radiographic findings, the presumptive diagnosis was that the lesions were GVMs. However, after surgical excision and histopathologic examination, the lesions were determined to be VMs because of the absence of glomus cells. Due to the difference in treatment modalities for VMs and GVMs, the ability to accurately diagnose these lesions clinically is essential. This case represents an anomalous presentation of multiple venous malformations occurring in two distinct locations in a 14-year-old boy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.