Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34290886›Full record

ReviewScars, burns & healing

Use of tape for the management of hypertrophic scar development: A comprehensive review.

Sarah O'Reilly, Erin Crofton, Jason Brown, Jennifer Strong, Jenny Ziviani

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Scars, burns & healing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06033430 (The Effectiveness of Dry Needling in Treating Linear Hypertrophic Scar Tissue), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06033430 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Effectiveness of Dry Needling in Treating Linear Hypertrophic Scar Tissue: a Randomized Sham-controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorIran University of Medical SciencesRan2023 to 2025Enrolled80ConditionsScar Tissue, Hypertrophic Scar, Hypertrophic Scar of Upper Arm (Disorder), Hypertrophic Surgical ScarArmsTrue dry needling, Sham dry needling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Current and Future Developments in Wound Healing.Facial plastic surgery : FPS · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah O'ReillyThe University of Queensland, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9026-5448
Erin CroftonThe University of Queensland, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jason BrownQueensland Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jennifer StrongThe University of Queensland, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jenny ZivianiThe University of Queensland, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Queensland Health · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTapes have been used to aid fresh wound closure. For hypertrophic scars, the use of tapes as a therapy to reduce the mechanical forces that stimulate excessive and long-term scarring is yet to be evaluated. The aim of this comprehensive review was to explore the current clinical application of tapes, as a minimally invasive option, as purposed specifically for the management of hypertrophic scarring, regardless of scar causation.

methodDatabases were searched using MeSH terms including one identifier for hypertrophic scar and one for the intervention of taping. Studies included the following: patients who received tape for a minimum of 12 weeks as a method of wound closure specifically for the purpose of scar prevention; those who received tape as a method of scar management after scar formation; reported outcomes addressing subjective and/or objective scar appearance; and were available in English.

resultsWith respect to non-stretch tapes, their use for the prevention of linear surgical scarring is evident in reducing scar characteristics of height, colour and itch. Statistically significant results were found in median scar width, reduction in procedure times and overall scar rating. Tapes were predominately applied by participants themselves, and incidence of irritation was infrequently reported. After 12 months, significance with respect to scar pain, itch, thickness and overall scar elevation was reported in one study investigating paper tape. Two papers reported the use of high stretch tapes; however, subjective results limited formal analysis. Although the use of taping for abnormal hypertrophic scar management is in its infancy, emerging research indicates tapes with an element of stretch may have a positive impact.

conclusionsNon-stretch tapes, for the prevention of linear surgical scarring, are effective in reducing scar characteristics of height, colour and itch. Paper tapes have shown effectiveness when applied during wound remodelling or even on mature scarring, with reported subjective changes in scar colour, thickness and pliability. Preliminary evidence of the benefits of high-stretch, elasticised tapes for scar management in the remodelling phase of wound healing have also been reported. LAY SUMMARY: Patients are often concerned about unsightly scars that form on their bodies after trauma, especially burn injuries. These scars can be thick, red and raised on the skin, and can impact on the patient's quality of life. For some scars, the process of skin thickening continues for up to two years after an injury.Unfortunately, scar formation is a part of the body's healing process, whereby there is a constant pull or tension under and along the skin's surface. The use of simple tapes, such as micropore

Indexed as

cicatrixreviewscartape

Identifiers

PMID34290886
PMCPMC8278453
OpenAlexW3180400042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.