Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34290878›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2021

Perioperative Outcomes Following Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation in Alberta, Canada: Research Letter.

Danielle E Fox, Robert R Quinn, Paul E Ronksley, Tyrone G Harrison, Hude Quan, David Bigam, A M James Shapiro, Rachel Jeong, Ngan N Lam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Danielle E FoxDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5343-4951
Robert R QuinnDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Paul E RonksleyDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3958-7561
Tyrone G HarrisonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1068-8673
Hude QuanDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
David BigamDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
A M James ShapiroDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Rachel JeongCumming School of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Ngan N LamDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0129-7091

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SPK) has benefits for patients with kidney failure and type I diabetes mellitus, but is associated with greater perioperative risk compared with kidney-alone transplantation. Postoperative care settings for SPK recipients vary across Canada and may have implications for patient outcomes and hospital resource use.

objectiveTo compare outcomes following SPK transplantation between patients receiving postoperative care in the intensive care unit (ICU) compared with the ward.

designRetrospective cohort study using administrative health data.

settingIn Alberta, the 2 transplant centers (Calgary and Edmonton) have different protocols for routine postoperative care of SPK recipients. In Edmonton, SPK recipients are routinely transferred to the ICU, whereas in Calgary, SPK recipients are transferred to the ward. PATIENTS: 129 adult SPK recipients (2002-2019). MEASUREMENTS: Data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database (CIHI-DAD) were used to identify SPK recipients (procedure codes) and the outcomes of inpatient mortality, length of initial hospital stay (LOS), and the occurrence of 16 different patient safety indicators (PSIs).

methodsWe followed SPK recipients from the admission date of their transplant hospitalization until the first of hospital discharge or death. Unadjusted quantile regression was used to determine differences in LOS, and age- and sex-adjusted marginal probabilities were used to determine differences in PSIs between centers.

resultsThere were no perioperative deaths and no major differences in the demographic characteristics between the centers. The majority of the SPK transplants were performed in Edmonton (n = 82, 64%). All SPK recipients in Edmonton were admitted to the ICU postoperatively, compared with only 11% in Calgary. There was no statistically significant difference in the LOS or probability of a PSI between the 2 centers (LOS for Edmonton vs Calgary:16 vs 13 days, LIMITATIONS: This study was conducted using administrative data and is limited by variable availability. The small sample size limited precision of estimated differences between type of postoperative care.

conclusionsFollowing SPK transplantation, we found no difference in inpatient outcomes for recipients who received routine postoperative ICU care compared with ward care. Further research using larger data sets and interventional study designs is needed to better understand the implications of postoperative care settings on patient outcomes and health care resource utilization.

Indexed as

Albertacenter-variationintensive care unitkidney-pancreas transplantationpostoperative management

Identifiers

PMID34290878
PMCPMC8274095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.