Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34290803›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences

Clinical outcomes of maitland mobilization in patients with Myofascial Chronic Neck Pain: A randomized controlled trial.

Maryam Shabbir, Naveed Arshad, Anam Naz, Nadia Saleem

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05404659 (Comparative Effects of Oscillatory Mobilizations and Mckenzie Retraction Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Disability in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05404659 naunknown statusnot on this map

Comparative Effects of Oscillatory Mobilizations and Mckenzie Retraction Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Disability in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled26ConditionsMechanical Neck PainArmsOscillatory Mobilization, Mckenzie Retraction Exercises
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maryam ShabbirDr. Maryam Shabbir, Ph.D. (Rehab) scholar, Associate Professor, Riphah International University, Lahore Pakistan.
Naveed ArshadDr. Naveed Arshad, M.Phil. (Rehab), Assistant Professor, Islamabad Medical and Dental College, Islamabad Pakistan.
Anam NazDr. Anam Naz, MS (Rehab), Senior Lecturer, The University of Lahore, Lahore Pakistan.
Nadia SaleemDr. Nadia Saleem, MS (Rehab), Assistant Professor, Bakhtawar Amin College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Multan Pakistan.
Karachi Medical and Dental College · PKRiphah International University · PKUniversity of Lahore · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveMyofascial neck pain is a common musculoskeletal problem caused by presence of trigger points and local and referred pain patterns. Chronic neck pain is responsible for the involvement of joints, ligaments, fascia and connective tissue as well. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of Maitland mobilization in patients with myofascial chronic neck pain.

methodsIn this randomized, placebo treatment-controlled trial, 30 patients consecutively aged 25-45 years meeting inclusion criteria were isolated into two groups. The study group was treated with Maitland mobilization consistently for eight weeks while the control group got placebo treatment for a similar timeframe. Visual analog Scale (VAS), Neck disability index (NDI) and cervical range of motion (ROM) questionnaire was filled by patients before, intermediate and after the intervention to evaluate the severity of pain, functional ability and range of motion.

resultsFollowing eight weeks of treatment, when compared the post treatment effects of both groups, the significance value for VAS was 0.008, for NDI p=0.030, for Flexion p=0.573, for extension p=0.001, for right rotation p<0.001, for left rotation p=0.002, for right and left side bending p<0.001.

conclusionThe study concluded that Maitland mobilization grades (I-IV) are effective in reducing pain and improving functional level of NDI scale and the ranges of cervical spine in patients with myofascial chronic neck pain.

Indexed as

Manual mobilizationMyofascial pain syndromesNeck painTherapeutics exercisesVisual analog scale

Identifiers

PMID34290803
PMCPMC8281150
OpenAlexW3157527298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.